Lass die Party steigen.
Folge Freunden und Gleichgesinnten um deinen Aktivitätsverlauf zu beleben. Du kannst dann täglich sehen (und auch kommentieren) was sie schauen, rezensieren, oder in ihre Merkliste aufnehmen.
Robert Pattinson is extraordinary as Chris Hansen. A near-perfect impersonation wrapped in a grimy, beautifully shot A24 thriller about predators, ratings and the ugly business of turning justice into entertainment.
🏴☠️When I saw this movie, I was carried away by the excitement of the adventure. I have waited a very long time to finally see a heroine as strong, fascinating, and likeable as Morgan Adams (Geena Davis). Her character is a wonderful change from most female characters I've seen. Davis is in a perfect role as a rough pirate woman.
Throughout the movie I remember hearing the audience cheering and clapping as the pirate companions foiled their foes. Everyone seemed to be electrified by the pure pirate adventure and chattered excitedly to one another as they exited the theater. Imagine my surprise when I heard how lousy this movie did in the box office.
I believe this movie's box office failure was a prime example of bad-timing and scathing reviews. Such reviews made me wonder if any of the reviewers had actually watched the movie! Pirate adventures are meant to be simple -- all treasure hunt and swashbuckling style. The incredible, well-done explosions and death defying stunts made this movie an edge of the seat experience.
Anyone who has ever enjoyed pirate adventure stories or role-played in treasure hunting genres will truly enjoy the fun ride of this movie.
Sometimes a treasure hunt is just a treasure hunt! Enjoy it!
Seven's quality puts it so far beyond most of the "cops on trail of deranged killer" genre that it comes out as a true jewel of cinema. Everything about seven is perfect. It is art captured on film. This movie is a bright spot for all of the stars who worked on it.
Brad Pitt never gets the credit he deserves for his acting because he's a pretty boy and the press is a lot more interested about how he and Jennifer are doing. That's a shame because he is a talented actor that isn't afraid to take chances with both the roles that he picks and the characters that he plays. That is quite rare in the A-list world. Morgan Freeman is a great actor. You can always count on him to do what he does best which is play a wise veteran that has seen it all. Kevin Spacey is another great actor that has great range and really puts life and personality into his characters.
The real talent of this movie, excluding the actors that brought it to life, is the director David Fincher and the writer Andrew Kevin Walker. Fincher's talents for making a visually stunning film are now well known and he often brings a dark patina to his work. Andrew Kevin Walker must have some incredible demons living inside him. Either that or one hell of an imagination for bringing the intricate story of Seven and the plan of John Doe to life.
John Doe's plan really is twisted and I won't be spoiling it here. Suffice to say I have never seen so evil and complicated a plan in a movie before or since. The cinematography of the film is dark but beautiful and throughout the film it is either night or raining or both except for two very brief moments. It is such an emotional movie that you can't keep from being caught up in what is happening. Do you understand and sympathize with what John Doe is doing or do you think him a mad killer that must be stopped.
Bottom Line: If you haven't had the opportunity to see Seven yet then you must at least rent it. It is so damn good that I know you will like it. The only reason you wouldn't is because you're just too damn fragile to take something this hardcore.
The Cycle was a pleasant surprise. A distinctly X-Files-inspired mystery that gets progressively darker, with an investigation every bit as engaging as the horror itself. Some excellent practical creature effects too. Refreshingly intelligent genre filmmaking.
Crawlers has some wonderfully gooey gore and a slightly strange sense of humour that gives it a bit of personality. Shame the final ten minutes descend into ridiculous decisions and increasingly unbelievable nonsense. Decent enough, but forgettable.
Hunting Matthew Nichols takes its time building an intriguing mystery around engaging characters before delivering a genuinely creepy ending. Could've used a few more scares along the way, but it's a smart little low-budget horror.
Verity takes nearly two hours to reveal what seems obvious within minutes. Dakota Johnson sleepwalks through another performance, the supposed suspense never materialises, and the lovely house is easily the most interesting thing on screen.
☣☢☂
I liked the main character's awkwardness and humor. His personality gave the movie a lot of charm, and I actually think the comedy worked really well when it came naturally from him. My problem is that the same goofy tone extended throughout too much of the rest of the movie.
I wish the director had leaned harder into a more serious horror tone while keeping the main character exactly as he was. Let him be the awkward, comical guy thrown into an increasingly horrifying situation, while the people and world around him remain serious and grounded. I think that contrast would have made his humor even funnier while allowing the horror to actually breathe. Instead, there were moments when it felt like everyone was in on the joke, and eventually the constant cheesy dialogue started taking away from the tension.
Because when this movie actually wants to be horror, it absolutely works.
The monsters were fantastic. The suspense and atmosphere were top notch, and there were some genuinely creepy sequences. The cinematography was excellent as well. The movie looks great, and there are plenty of shots that capture that grimy, unsettling Resident Evil feeling. The music was another highlight and did a great job building tension and complementing the atmosphere.
That is why the excessive comedy and cheese frustrated me so much. The movie already had all the ingredients for a genuinely great horror experience. It did not need to constantly undercut itself with another joke or cheesy line of dialogue.
Keep the main character weird. Keep him awkward. Keep him funny. That is part of what makes him likable. But surround him with a darker, more serious world and let the monsters, suspense, and atmosphere carry the rest.
There is a really good Resident Evil horror movie underneath all the cheese. I just wish the director had trusted the horror a little more.
RIP Patrick Stewart
"Death Train" is a bad movie. It's just the sort of action picture you need to watch without questioning details and just accept the film for what it is...action-packed and exciting but not much more.
Christopher Lee plays a disgruntled ex-Soviet general who longs for the good old days of the Cold War. His plan is to hijack a train with a nuclear bomb aboard and use it to destroy relations between the new Russia and the West. And, just in case one bomb doesn't seem to fit the bill, he's arranged for a backup. So it's up to a multinational team through the UN to stop them and that means Patrick Stewart will be in charge back out of harm's way and Pierce Brosnan and some other commandoes go in and try to take out the General's men before it's too late.
Lots of explosions, shooting and near misses. There isn't much more to this, but the film still manages to entertain. My only quibble, and it's a tiny one, is WHY does the female sharpshooter scream every time she shoots during the finale?!
🚫👻
Ghostbusters: Afterlife is so much better than the 2016 Ghostbusters! There is none of that forced, cringeworthy comedy. Instead, it has an engaging story, great performances, and some genuinely touching connections to the original Ghostbusters. It is a rare example of a sequel done right.
On top of that, Paul Rudd's natural and believable performance is about 10,000 times better than watching Chris Hemsworth act like an idiot in the 2016 Ghostbusters!
🥵 Be prepared to spend 90 minutes on the edge of your seat. With excellent production, great casting, and a clever but nerve-wrecking plot, 200 Degrees will have you biting your nails on pins and needles. This thriller is chock full of suspense with twists and turns you will NEVER see coming. Balfour and Cochell give excellent deliveries that will have you anxiously sweating bullets and really feeling the heat.
I somehow really wanted to like 'Wishmaster'. I had such high hopes for the film after the opening sequence with all those jaw-dropping practical effects and make-up guaranteed to make the viewer cringe in horror.
Unfortunately, the film just got worse from there. The film revolves around an evil Djinn trapped inside a precious stone. Alexandra (Tammy Lauren) accidentally wakes the Djinn when cleaning the Opal. Although her back story was important for character development, I didn't find the character all that interesting. In fact, neither did I find any of the characters all that interesting. The acting also wasn't all that convincing.
The biggest issue I have with the film, is the choice of lead actor: Andrew Divoff as the Djinn. With all due respect to the actor, he simply wasn't the ideal choice for the role. Think what Robert England did for 'Nightmare on Elm Street', or Doug Bradley for 'Hellraiser'. Divoff is too smooth looking to be credible as evil. I suppose they wanted him to be handsome behind a mask of evil, but even that didn't work for me.
The film does dish up some good moments, but I wasn't impressed with 'Wishmaster' in general. The narration felt lazy, as did the filmmaking with it's shaky and shattering transitions, which gave the film a cheap look. I can commend the film of some truly crazy effects and visuals, which are definitely the film's highlight. Also note, this is a very brutal and gory movie.
In closing, 'Wishmaster' is not entirely bad. Watch it for the gory effects; you might get a kick out of it. Oh, and be careful what you wish for... I wished for this to have been better.
Devour is AI slop. A heavy metal band battling vampires, parents and a werewolf should be great fun. Instead, it’s terrible writing, wooden acting and an incoherent mess of AI-generated action. All the ingredients for a decent horror film, completely wasted.
A slow moving people based drama set in a post apocalyptic world. This is not an all out action film although plenty of set piece action sequences happen along the way. The Junction scene feels strange and detached from the rest of the movie in a way that almost pulls you out of the narrative. The main character of Hig is thoughtful and emotional and acted impeccably. Most of the performances are top drawer although not sure about anyone in the Junction scene. This is visually stunning with a beautiful score. Its a slow moving people based drama but the 2 hours still passes without noticing. This is not Ridley Scott's best movie but beautiful nonetheless.
Gene Wilder is good in this movie. There are some very funny scenes throughout and, although it may seem quite dated, it's unquestionably enjoyable sometimes. Plenty of laughs and gags to be had. The other actors are cast great in this movie. SPOOKILY FUNNY!
Nick Cage was only 22 when he made this period piece. Chariots of Fire (1981) must have been in the back of his mind. Ned Hanlon was not a big enough name to interest the viewer, and he was a naive young man. But it was a nice, but not remarkable movie. He did build his pecs up for this-- he always gets into his character.
"Hanky Panky" is a lighthearted comedy that delivers plenty of laughs and fun moments. Directed by Sidney Poitier and starring Gene Wilder and Gilda Radner, the film combines humor with a thrilling storyline that keeps viewers entertained from start to finish.
The movie's charm lies in its ability to blend comedy with suspense. Gene Wilder is excellent in the lead role, bringing his signature wit and quirky personality to the screen. His comedic timing is flawless, and he manages to make even the most chaotic situations seem amusing. Gilda Radner is equally delightful, adding warmth and energy to the film with her spirited performance. Together, their chemistry is both natural and enjoyable, making their scenes together a highlight of the movie.
The pacing is steady, with enough twists and turns to keep the audience engaged without feeling overwhelmed. The story balances its comedic elements with just the right amount of action, creating a satisfying mix that works well for fans of both genres. Visually, the film makes good use of its locations, adding a sense of adventure to the plot. The score complements the story perfectly, enhancing the mood without overshadowing the humor. While "Hanky Panky" may not be groundbreaking, it's a solid choice for anyone looking for an entertaining movie with likable characters and plenty of laughs. It's light, funny, and easy to watch, making it perfect for a relaxing evening.
If you enjoy movies that combine humor with a touch of mystery, "Hanky Panky" is worth checking out. It's a fun ride that showcases the talents of its cast and leaves you smiling by the end.
If you love comedies, but haven't seen Young Frankenstein, you're in for a delicious treat.After three decades, it still makes people laugh to death, and it's a must-see for every spoof lover in the world.
Actually, it's not a parody, but a homage by Mel Brooks to James Whale's classic,shot in black and white on the same location and with the same props.
The "hero" is Dr.Frederick Frankenstein(Gene Wilder), who, after a long period in which he hated it, decides to repeat his grandfather's experiment.The result is the Transylvanians want to kill him, despite the fact that the monster is the most harmless creature in the world.
This sort of sequel to the original Frankenstein is hilarious from start to finish, mostly because of two actors:Peter Boyle and Martin Feldman.The former is great as the mute creature(he'll compensate that by talking too much in Everybody Loves Raymond), particularly in the scene with Gene Hackman's Blind Man.But it's Feldman's Igor that makes this film unmissable.No wonder, given he's got the best lines("Wait Master.It might be dangerous...you go first").
With no doubt Mel Brooks' masterpiece.
The Scary Movie franchise wishes it was this good.
Hubie Halloween has all the ingredients for a great Halloween comedy, but wastes them on nonsensical plotting, painfully unfunny jokes and Adam Sandler doing an irritating voice. My kids enjoyed it, I spent most of the film wondering how such a decent cast ended up in this rubbish.
With "Hannibal Lecktor" (Brian Cox) now safely behind bars, the traumatised profiler "Graham" (William Petersen) might be looking forward to a well earned-retirement. Thing is, the "Tooth Fairy" has other plans as he embarks on a killing spree that causes his erstwhile FBI boss "Crawford" (Dennis Farina) to seek his help. These murders are truly gruesome with entire families killed, inside their own homes, on nights with a full moon. With the next one of those due very soon, "Graham" has to enlist the help of his former tormentor - whose help is never as straightforward as he might like - to see if they can establish some patterns and preempt more slaughter. Meantime, we are introduced to "Dollarhyde" (Tom Noonan) who's about eight foot tall and maybe not the most stable of photographers we are ever going to meet. It's possible that he might succumb to the more calming influence of the lovingly blind "Reba" (Joan Allen) but with the pressures mounting you wouldn't want to bet on that. Is there a connection? As with Thomas Harris's "Red Dragon" book, the audience is aware of far more than the pursuers and that works well here as we see "Graham" try to work from a blank canvas, and with an insane convict, to track down a man who has left virtually nothing for them to go on. Petersen holds this together quite well and the cleverly cast Cox, well he always comes across as an actor who'd be quite prepared to eat the competition. I found the ending just a little rushed, but the jigsaw is well presented and the jeopardy effectively increased throughout this quite chilling adaptation. Honestly - I didn't much care for the intrusively synthesised score - just a little too much "Miami Vice" for me - but this is a solid and at times quite gripping story of imbalance and mania that I did quite enjoy.
An absolutely dreadful Australian slasher populated by unlikeable idiots with no depth and some of the worst dialogue I’ve heard in years. The practical gore and prosthetics are occasionally impressive, but they’re nowhere near enough to save this rubbish.
🕷️🕸️
The itsy bitsy spider went up the water spout.
Down came the rain and washed the spider out.
Out came the sun and dried up all the rain.
Then the itsy bitsy spider went up the spout again.
Okay…put your fingers together.
Let’s do The Itsy Bitsy Spider.
The itsy bitsy spider went up the water spout.
Down came the rain and washed the spider out.
Out came the sun and dried up all the rain.
Then the itsy bitsy spider went up the spout again.
A little faster now.
The itsy bitsy spider went up the water spout.
Down came the rain and washed the spider out.
Out came the sun and dried up all the rain.
The BBC had of course produced their own 'story' of 'Only Fool's, the beloved sitcom back in 2002, but it never really felt complete what with the 2003 episode still to air, and the spin-offs that were made later.
Quite why TV channel Gold have made this newer version rather than the Beeb is surprising but I'm not complaining as this series brings together lots of the remaining cast members (and sadly we've lost a few) talking about making the iconic show and its memorable moments, with each episode having a set focus.
It's lovely to see this show being honoured in such a way, and reminds us in particular of the brilliance of writer John Sullivan.
