Two Jedi escape a hostile blockade to find allies and come across a young boy who may bring balance to the Force, but the long-dormant Sith resurface to claim their former glory.
Where to Watch Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
- Brandon ElbersSeptember 5, 2026Sets up the timeline for the rest of the movies fairly well, but Lucas and others dragged it down by trying to be overly family friendly and introducing Jar-Jar and other cheesy characters.
- parktool69December 1, 2024cool music
- Seabee4uuAugust 19, 2026The least worthwhile of the nine movies. It has the worst casting of all the movies (Jake Lloyd as Baby Anakin) for bad acting as well as bad writing for the character. As a bonus you also get the worst character of the whole franchise, the useless Jar-Jar Binks whose sole purpose is nothing else than idiotic comic relief. This one sucks basically.
- KennyBarrozJune 13, 2025The lightsaber duel with Darth Maul is a clear highlight, and Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor bring strong performances as Jedi. However, the film stumbles with slow political plotlines and clunky dialogue. Jar Jar Binks’ comic relief doesn’t land for many, and young Anakin’s role feels underdeveloped. Despite flaws, it sets the stage for the saga’s deeper story and delivers memorable moments. Bold and beautiful, but uneven in execution.
- Jagger JohnsonJuly 3, 2025Still waiting for my Ben Quadinaros spin-off series.
- CubaneAugust 10, 2026Qui-Gon Gin Drinker pretends not to know what a currency exchange is so that he can screw around on Tattooine gambling on death races and causing trouble. The Jedi are obviously the good guys. I will not be taking questions.
- nessa.baudelaireMarch 24, 2025impossible to say for certain whether or not this is good star wars
- Ecto-1AJuly 29, 2026🌌 The Saga Begins… Again After nearly two decades without a new Star Wars film, George Lucas clearly wanted to make a major splash with the prequel trilogy. Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace starts off stiff and slow, but it gradually picks up after the first thirty minutes and truly takes off around the one-hour mark. Still, Lucas played his hand carefully, resisting the temptation to overload the opening chapter with nonstop action and special effects. Instead, he attempted to recapture the gradual sense of adventure and discovery that made the original film so memorable. The introduction of Jar Jar Binks, a well-meaning Gungan outcast from the planet Naboo, makes it easy to understand why the character was hated by some and annoyed by many. Had the film been released today, Jar Jar undoubtedly would have become a permanent fixture in internet memes. Overall, the movie serves as a pleasant and relatively gentle introduction to the prequel trilogy, leaving plenty of room for the sequels to expand the story and raise the stakes. Unfortunately, it was released during an era when Hollywood was becoming increasingly dependent on CGI. At times, the sheer amount of computer-generated imagery made the film feel more like an animated Pixar production than a live-action Star Wars adventure. A greater reliance on practical effects, with CGI used more selectively, would have given many scenes a more grounded and convincing appearance. The climactic lightsaber battle is built up effectively and avoids being buried beneath excessive dialogue or gratuitous visual effects. In the end, The Phantom Menace remains a worthy and important entry in the series, especially because it establishes the characters, conflicts and political events that shape everything that follows.
- cursedbagsJune 11, 2025Carried By Jar Jar.
- Bryn SmithMay 4, 2026I absolutely love this film. From being a child when this was released in 1999, after having watched the original trilogy during the 1997 re-master release, it was incredible! The special effects were groundbreaking for it's day. the character of JarJar appealed to me in a way no character did in the originals, which i believe was George Lucas' intention. I love the story and seeing the humble beginnings of Darth Vader, the characters are some of the greatest in the franchise, Qui-Gon Jinn, Darth Maul. As an adult i appreciate and find interest in the more political themes of the republic and love how this is then further elaborated in subsequent installments and series such as the Clone Wars animated show. Now after nearly 30 years, i watch this film back with a fantastic sense of nostalgia and a love for my generation's Star Wars films.
- AidansCollectionYTJuly 17, 2026Giant jump in quality from the last Star Wars project I watched (the acolyte). But still not perfect, child Anakin was kinda annoying, and I think I finally get why everyone I know hates Jar Jar. Although duel of the fates was amazing. Love this movie.
- KGM SOSAJune 14, 2026This film put me in a very awkward position. For most of my adult life, I’ve been one of those people who dismisses Star Wars as geeky nerd slop, to be frank I always thought it was kind of gay. Harsh? Maybe. But that’s genuinely how I’ve always viewed the franchise. However, I also remembered really enjoying the prequel trilogy as a kid despite never being particularly invested in the original films. So I decided it was finally time to put my biases aside & do a proper marathon of the original six films (only the original six films, I have absolutely zero interest in any of the garbage that came afterwards). To my surprise, I actually had a really good time. This was a 7/10 for me (Good / Enjoyable / Worth watching once or twice). I remembered liking the next two prequels, but I could barely remember this one. Watching it as an adult, I found it surprisingly entertaining & much better than I expected. I had a fun time watching it now as an adult. It definitely did have its negatives & I understand why this one gets a mixed reaction now, firstly some of the CGI is genuinely dated & quite bad, for example depending on the lighting conditions of the scene Jar Jar Binks looks terribly cartoon next to your life action human actor counterparts, they probably could of benefited from mixing practical costume design with CGI instead of going all digital because in well lit conditions it looked horrible, until I get to the originals as I’m watching in chronological order rather than release order, I won’t be able to say for sure but I suspect that even the 70s/80s films Jar Jar Binks didn’t even look as bad & this entry was 1999. Another issue I have is the master is poor for this film, I have the pinnacle of a file for this, a 4k HDR high bitrate copy, it doesn’t get much better than the file I have & it didn’t look that good at all. At first I suspected that maybe it was shot digitally which would explain the limitations because as a result they couldn’t rescan it in true 4k or HDR but I was surprised to find out it was shot on 35mm film. This led me down the rabbit hole as a 4k rescan should have been incredibly detailed (35mm film stores 6k resolution naturally) so I didn’t understand why this films looked 1080p; The answer basically boils down to how the movie’s visual effects were locked in 1999 & how Lucasfilm chose to process the master. The 2K VFX Bottleneck is the biggest reason, While the movie was captured on highly detailed 35mm film over 90% of the film contains digital visual effects. In 1999, computers were not powerful enough to render CGI at 4K so ILM (Industrial Light & Magic) scanned the 35mm film into computers at 2K resolution (roughly 1080p detail) & baked everything together into a final 2K digital master; Because the original raw computer files & software packages from 1999 no longer exist or cannot be run today, Lucasfilm cannot simply hit "re-render in 4K" thus 4K copies are a digital upscale of that 1999 2K master. There was also aggressive digital noise reduction (DNR), when you upscale a 2K image to 4K, the pixels get stretched, which can introduce artificial noise. To counter this Lucasfilm applied heavy DNR. DNR is a software filter that scrubs away image noise & natural film grain, unfortunately it cannot differentiate between "noise" & "fine detail, so by wiping out the grain the software also erased pores, skin textures & clothing details. This creates a waxy, smeared, artificially flat look. All this contributes to the subpar master we got & why the 4k looks 1080p even with the added HDR colours & high bitrate. There were also some minor audio quirks, particularly with volume levels, though I’m nowhere near enough of an audiophile to break that down the same way I can with the visual stuff. However the acting was great, not as flawless as I remember being in the next 2 films of the prequels but still decent enough acting worth mentioning. I thought Natalie Portman & Kira Knightley are criminally underrated, their performances were great, I also thought Ewan McGregor, Jake Lloyd, Ian McDiarmid & Samuel L Jackson did a great job, Ray Park was menacing as Darth Maul despite having limited dialogue, creating one of the most memorable villains in the franchise through pure presence alone. I even feel like Liam Neeson did a spectacular job in this, I’ve always liked him, but I’ve often thought of him as someone with a somewhat limited range. This movie genuinely challenged that perception. His performance as Qui-Gon Jinn had far more depth & subtlety than I remembered Overall this is a fun movie & although maybe the weakest entry in the original 6 films, it still was a fun time despite its technical flaws. It has some interesting political undertones exploring democracy, dictatorship, religion & more that I didn’t have the time to explore here, nor in my head so I don’t know where I sit with that but it’s clever regardless. Again I rate this a 7/10 (Good / Enjoyable / Worth watching once or twice).
- September 28, 2026As much as I love "The Phantom Menace" there's one thing I would have done differently and that is let "Darth Maul" live all the way to the 3rd film. Darth Maul for me, was wasted a 💯 As he is easily one of the most memorable & interesting characters in the entire prequel trilogy. With the little amount of screen time that we had of him in "The Phantom Menace" your eyes are just totally glued to the screen the whole time whenever he is. He just had this prescence and aura about him and I just love the look of the character, he just looks like a proper intimidating badass villain & antagonist. And on top of that, he was part of imo, the best duel of the entire franchise. Duel Of The Fates is such an awesome & breathtaking duel fight, between Darth Maul, Gui-Gon & Obi-Wan the whole time. However, there is an argument that for why replacing Maul wouldn't have worked. Because Count Dooku & General Grevious serve very different purposes, while Palpatine remained the true mastermind behind everything the whole time. Here's my personal idea 💡 of how this trilogy, could have still worked even better and we're still introduced to "Count Dooku" and with "General Grevious" being scripted in there exactly the same. And Here's a very interesting trilogy structure we could have had potentially, if "Darth Maul" had survived and they kept him for further movies in the prequel trilogy: 👇 Episode 1 The Phantom Menace - Maul vs. Qui-Gon & Obi-Wan 👇 ➡️ Maul Survives. ➡️ Anakin is trained. ➡️ Sidious begins manipulating both Maul & Anakin. Episode 2 Attack Of The Clones - Maul vs. Obi-Wan/Anakin instead of Count Dooku 👇 ➡️ Darth Maul realises Anakin is becoming more and more powerful. ➡️ Anakin begins questioning the Jedi. ➡️ Darth Maul becomes so jealous to the point, he'll do whatever it takes to remain Sidious's apprentice. Which plays massively in Sidious's hands. Episode 3 The Revenge Of The Sith Darth Maul vs Anakin 👇 ➡️ Everything plays into Sidious's hands perfectly as he is able and does force his two apprentices into conflict and a duel. ➡️ Anakin then defeats Darth Maul. ➡️ But by killing Maul, Anakin takes another closer step towards the dark side. ➡️ Sidious then reveals that Darth Maul, was never the real prize Anakin was. 🖤 And we all know what happens from there. So the big question of this discussion is, would you keep the prequel trilogy exactly how it is. Would you have it similar to mine and have "Darth Maul" make it to the 3rd film. Or would you have taken the trilogy, in a much different direction to both the trilogy we ended up getting and my version of it. Please let me know in the comments section below, where you would have taken the trilogy, of course "Anakin still has to become "Darth Vader" but in regards to the whole build upto it and everything around "Anakin's" transformation into Vader I mean. I'd like to know your ideas 👇
👹 Darth Maul ⚔️🔴 Could they have kept him alive until the 3rd one?
Watch Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace Videos
Get Plex on Your Devices
Free on 20+ platforms. Pick yours.Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace Trivia
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace was released on May 19, 1999.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace was directed by George Lucas.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace has a runtime of 2h 16m.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace was produced by Rick McCallum.
Two Jedi escape a hostile blockade to find allies and come across a young boy who may bring balance to the Force, but the long-dormant Sith resurface to claim their former glory.
The key characters in Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace are Qui-Gon Jinn (Liam Neeson), Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor), Padmé Amidala (Natalie Portman).
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace is rated PG.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace is an Action, Adventure, Science Fiction film.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace has an audience rating of 5.9 out of 10.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace had a budget of $115M.
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace has made $1.05B at the box office.