スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族
監督:James Watkins
あるアメリカ人一家のベン、ルイーズと娘のアグネスが、旅行先で知り合った感じの良い、こちらも子連れのイギリス人一家のパトリック、キアラと親しくなり、週末の休みに自宅へ招待される。到着したのは人里離れ、隣家も居ない静かな場所に存在する一軒家。周りを散策したり食事を楽しんだりして過ごしていたが、次第にパトリック一家の“おもてなし”に小さな違和感を抱き始める。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族の視聴方法
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族の評価とレビュー
- rg94002024年11月1日It's impossible to divorce the American remake of Speak No Evil from its original which was only released 2 years prior to this one. In a lot of ways, the first half follows the original pretty closely. I don't remember exact details, but the general vibe and high level beats seem to be the same. This movie isn't as unsettling as the original in this portion of the movie, trying to be a little more sanitized overall. Still, the general concept of hell being other people is still present here. However, I sort of figured by the marketing campaign which really emphasized some of the horror elements that this movie was not shy about where it is heading, and indeed it telegraphs its second half quickly. The uncomfortableness of living with new people simply isn't as sharp because of it. There's also a bit of an attempt to focus on concepts of toxic masculinity here, and while I think some interesting things could have been done there with the interplay between Paddy and Ben, it just never really is able to breathe enough within the constraints of the plot. Of course, it's the second half which seems to have been the primary focus for James Watkins. While the original left this portion of the plot until the very end, lending itself to a dramatic and shocking ending, this movie instead spends a good portion of the runtime on it, resulting in a second half that feels drastically different. Now, for transparency, I do not love the ending to the original at all, finding it unnecessary and at odds with a lot of the themes built up throughout the rest of the movie. Because of that, I didn't particularly care if this movie changed things up, and it does so in spades. It ends up feeling a bit cliched, pulling from a lot of Western horror movies within this sort of subgenre. However, I found it fairly gripping, and James McAvoy is always fun to watch. I felt Mackenzie Davis is a very good actress, but this isn't her best work (though she's still decent). I also thought this portion of the movie was actually able to connect with some of the themes built up regarding family in a way that the ending of the original just never did. Overall, this is very much a Hollywood remake of a foreign horror movie, but one that still manages to be engaging. While I think the first half is not nearly as strong as the original, I actually prefer this one's ending, even if it feels a lot more by the numbers (mostly because I do not like the ending of the original).
- killebee62026年3月22日While scary - more scary in a yes, that could happen kind of way. My wife was so bored the first hour as the buildup was extremely long. So many "triggers" exposed, they were true scary movie protagonists - meaning they were stupid
- jdhann2025年9月14日White people are dumb af.
- The Gutter Monkey2025年3月22日I'm a sucker for stories about friendly strangers who turn out more unnerving as time goes on. This wasn't the best of that bunch, but it holds its own.
- Paul Walsh2026年3月3日Not as oppressive as the original movie. Not as shocking as the original movie. Not as good as the original movie. It is average.
- shirazesat2025年12月27日Excellent fun!
- carale142025年12月13日Brilliant film, really enjoyed it.
- Niztradamus2025年11月16日Having seen the Danish original (that came out mere two years prior to this one) and this American remake back to back this movie is not only completely unnecessary, retelling the same story americanized and only changes that made the movie objectively worse. I don't want to get into any spoilers but the most disturbing, heart wrenching scenes do not happen at all but they try to make up for it by removing any bit of subtlety the original had... As Maynard Keegan said: What became of subtlety? He was talking about fisting, I am talking about American movie story telling. Also much of the story doesn't even make sense. Realism isn't really the movies strong suite. To me the mere existence of this movie is utterly pointless. They only diluted many parts of the story and psychological terror by injecting ideologies and fake morals in a way that feels tacked on. This movie overdues everything but then underdelivers in the most gruesome scenes by rewriting them completely, often even cutting them out completely. The ending is very different to the original and also misses the point in it's entirety. This one isn't bad but still one to avoid. Stick to the original. You won't die from reading some subtitles while a lot of the movie is in English anyway. The families in the original are Danish and Dutch and obviously don't understand each other by using their native tongue. Just do yourself a favor and watch that version. This one is really shit if you seen the original.
- Bruno Lobato2025年6月8日So tense but with a quite predictable ending. Another bullseye performance from McAvoy “Split” style. His ability to character switch just by voice tone and micro expressions it’s impressive
- ርልዪረ2025年11月8日Speak No Evil is a 2024 psychological horror remake starring James Mcavoy as Paddy, a English father who invites a American family to come to their house and relax, however not everything is all it seems from the new Blumhouse feature. While getting most of the aspects on point from the 2022 foreign film of the same name, Speak No Evil does create a good level of tension while exploding into a violent climax which is a good aspect regarding the film's strong point as a psychological horror flick. The American family are very likable and very realistic when it comes to some of the more tense scenes of threat, you do really sympathise with them in general and throughout most of the runtime you do also get to see some of what there views are on the other English family. At first they think it's a new way of bonding with their new home but as the film progresses there perspectives slowly change and it makes you think if they will ever recover from the horrific things they have witnessed so far which does add a level of clarity and dread to the film's dark tone and that's very good. Acting-wise, very top notch for a Blumhouse feature nowadays as James Mcavoy really is quite terrifying but funny at the same time. He is very identical. He reminds me of Jack Torrance from The Shining, very maniacal and twisted figure that has his comedic elements scattered throughout, I thought this was quite a interesting thing that I might notice but I think Paddy was a little bit different though just because of his charming aspect rather than a downward spiral of Jack's character's. Overall, while quite a solid entry into the Blumhouse library, the fatal flaw of this thriller is the lack of homage to the original film which really should be respected, but it seems like this entry does completely avoid some aspects which a remake shouldn't do unless it has a good reason to. But it's still a worthy, fun watch for a evening night.
- vangh12024年10月29日The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo meets Straw Dogs This movie delivers exactly what the trailer promises, it fulfills the expectations set by the premise, but nonetheless I didn't feel fulfilled or satisfied as the credits rolled. I appreciated a lot that it's a really gradual build and slow burn, but once things start to pop off it doesn't really do anything unique or especially memorable. (Which I fully acknowledge gets harder to do with each passing year!) I think the theme and the characters are generally well examined, but the crux of my problem with it is that the type of parents that the protagonists are shown to be simply wouldn't stay in that situation so long, regardless of the movie's attempts to explain around that. So in the end it's not an especially exciting ride as a horror/thriller nor a real deep dive as thematic exploration. 2.5 stars feels a little harsh, but at the same time it really did hit right down the middle for me.
- Kevin Ward2025年7月1日Really conflicted on this because I loved McAvoy’s performance and perhaps McKenzie Davis’s even more, but felt like the core elements that make this story worth telling at all were done so much better in the original film. McAvoy’s Paddy in particular is much more brash and antagonistic from the get-go that challenged believability that Ben (Scoot McNairy) and Louise (Davis) would choose to spend any time with this family. In the Danish original, Patrick/Paddy and Karin/Ciara go to much greater lengths to ingratiate themselves to the Dalton’s. It was actually kind of fascinating to me how different the Paddy character comes off despite following almost the exact same beats of the original. One of the first interactions in this new film has the Dalton’s letting their daughter Agnes ride on a moped without a helmet in a foreign country with a total stranger. There’s just no world where I let that happen. I know the whole point is that Paddy and Ciara are pushing the limits of what abuses people are willing to accept out of politeness and/or fear of speaking out, but the Danish film really did a much better job of believably easing the Dalton’s into tougher confrontational moments. Obviously, the other big change is the ending. And I certainly see the appeal of this changed ending. It’s far, far less bleak than the original, and admittedly it’s almost satisfying. But as much of a downer the original ending is, it really felt like a poetic (rather Biblical) ending to have them (spoilers ahead) stripped to the nude and stoned to death. That is a method of execution used to purge evil from the community. The Danish film is clearly critical of the Dalton’s behavior, their willingness to look the other way and not stand up to the abuses being committed. 🙈🙉🙊 See no evil, Hear no evil, Speak no evil. And while the American ending doesn’t absolve the Dalton’s or wrongdoing here, it certainly gives them a much better out than their Danish counterparts. Sure the new ending more satisfying to an extent and get why that decision was made for an American theatrical release, but I think the original film’s ending has more to say, and left a lasting impression on my mind. There’s not much of anything that happens in the final act of the new one that will stay with me the way the original did.
- PatrikStar2025年6月28日I didn’t really like the original ending, and the Hollywood one felt too generic, but James McAvoy’s performance is absolutely world-class!
- Joe2025年6月15日Such a great story concept, but the execution left me frustrated. The acting was great and I loved the locations.
- Disent2025年9月24日of course the husband is uselss and the woman dont need no man!
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族を視聴
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族に関するトリビア
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族は2024年9月11日に公開されました。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族はJames Watkinsが監督を務めました。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族の上映時間は1h 50mです。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族はJason Blum, Paul Ritchie, Taylor Berryがプロデューサーを務めました。
あるアメリカ人一家のベン、ルイーズと娘のアグネスが、旅行先で知り合った感じの良い、こちらも子連れのイギリス人一家のパトリック、キアラと親しくなり、週末の休みに自宅へ招待される。到着したのは人里離れ、隣家も居ない静かな場所に存在する一軒家。周りを散策したり食事を楽しんだりして過ごしていたが、次第にパトリック一家の“おもてなし”に小さな違和感を抱き始める。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族の主要人物はPaddy (James McAvoy), Louise Dalton (Mackenzie Davis), Ben Dalton (Scoot McNairy)です。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族はPG12と評価されています。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族はドラマ, ホラー, スリラー映画です。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族は、視聴者によって10点満点中8.3点をつけられています。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族の予算は$1500万です。
スピーク・ノー・イーブル 異常な家族の興行収入は$7723.9万です。