Firing Line

The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?

E39    Nov 30, 1966    60m
Taped on Dec 1, 1966 (New York City, NY)

While many people had been skeptical of the Warren Report's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the assassination of President Kennedy, Mr. Lane's book was the first to lay out the argument seriously. He defends himself ably in this spirited exchange. ML: "I take really the same position Alfreda Scoby, one of the lawyers for the Warren Commission, takes, and that is, had Oswald lived, he could not have been proven guilty, had he faced trial, based upon the evidence the Commission was able to secure." WFB: "And of course Warren says that he was a practicing district attorney for ten or twelve years and he could have gotten a conviction in 48 hours with the evidence. You simply disagree with him professionally." ML: "That's nonsense. It would take longer than that to pick a jury, of course." WFB: "Do you think Warren should be impeached?" ML: "I don't think he should be impeached. I think the report should be impeached." -The Firing Line Archives @ The Hoover Institute, Stanford University

Guest(s):

1) Lane, Mark. - lawyer, author of Rush to Judgment

YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=19aLDtjNHPQ
Where to Watch The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?
Cast of The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?
  • Mark LaneSelf - Guest
 
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Take Plex everywhere

Watch free anytime, anywhere, on almost any device.
See the full list of supported devices