Crown Court

Season 1972

Crown Court is an afternoon television courtroom drama produced by Granada Television for the ITV network that ran from 1972, when the Crown Court system replaced Assize courts and Quarter sessions in the legal system of England and Wales, to 1984.

Where to Watch Season 1972

36 Episodes

  • Doctor's Neglect? (1)
    E1
    Doctor's Neglect? (1)Mr Simpson was admitted to hospital following a car crash in Fulchester. He was examined by doctors and treated for minor injuries before being discharged. Moments later, Mr Simpson collapsed on the forecourt of the hospital and was rushed back inside for emergency brain surgery, from which he died. His widow Mrs Simpson is suing the hospital for neglect, claiming that the doctors who initially treated her husband missed the injury.
  • Doctor's Neglect? (2)
    E2
    Doctor's Neglect? (2)
  • Doctor's Neglect? (3)
    E3
    Doctor's Neglect? (3)
  • Liberman v Savage (1)
    E4
    Liberman v Savage (1)The first broadcast case in Crown Court is a civil dispute between businessman Emmanuel Lieberman and his former fiancée Delia Savage. With a claim over a penthouse suite, is Mr. Lieberman's claims she had an affair with his son true?
  • Liberman v Savage (2)
    E5
    Liberman v Savage (2)Former Met officer and private inquiry agent is questioned over his involvement in the investigation into an alleged infidelity concerning Mrs Delia Savage. She in turn is called to give evidence in her defence concerning any romantic involvement with the plaintiff Emmanuel Lieberman's son Mark Lieberman. Her evidence suggests that their relation was platonic and that his presence in her flat was merely coincidental.
  • Liberman v Savage (3)
    E6
    Liberman v Savage (3)On the final day the live-in maid Florence Ferguson is called to give evidence, as is Lieberman's son Mark.
  • Regina v Lord (1)
    E7
    Regina v Lord (1)Teacher Helen Lord is in court due to attacking a police officer with a chisel after losing her job. Yet when the court tries to find out why Lord was sacked, and the connection with the police, withheld evidence becomes a major factor.
  • Regina v Lord (2)
    E8
    Regina v Lord (2)Mr Deeley continues to argue for the disclosure of a letter issued by the Chief Constable to the school's headmistress.
  • Regina v Lord (3)
    E9
    Regina v Lord (3)The content of the letter is revealed, Miss Lord takes the stand, and the prosecution and defence make their final statements. With witnesses and medical reports both heard, it's left to the jury to decide if Lord was guilty of intent.
  • Regina v Bryant (1)
    E10
    Regina v Bryant (1)Harry Bryant has been identified as one of four men who carried out an armed bank robbery. However, Harry has plans to prove his innocence - starting with dismissing his legal aid and conducting his own defence.
  • Regina v Bryant (2)
    E11
    Regina v Bryant (2)The accused, Harry Bryant, acting as his defence, intensively interrogates the arresting officer Inspector Collins to discredit his methods used to investigate and arrest him on what he claims are false charges and planted evidence. Although the prosecution tries to use Bryant's extensive criminal history, Bryant continues his attack on police methods using corroborating evidence given by Collins' assistant Sergeant Fisher.
  • Regina v Bryant (3)
    E12
    Regina v Bryant (3)Harry Bryant's wife is called upon as a witness, followed by Harry himself. With full disclosure of Harry's previous convictions, the jury are asked to adjourn and reach a verdict.
  • Euthanasia: Regina v Webb (1)
    E13
    Euthanasia: Regina v Webb (1)Lawrence Webb is in court after giving his cancer-stricken wife a fatal overdose of morphine. He claims that it was deliberate to stop her suffering, but is under suspicion of murder as the jury hears evidence regarding her death.
  • Euthanasia: Regina v Webb (2)
    E14
    Euthanasia: Regina v Webb (2)
  • Euthanasia: Regina v Webb (3)
    E15
    Euthanasia: Regina v Webb (3)
  • Regina v Vennings & Vennings (1)
    E16
    Regina v Vennings & Vennings (1)A father and son are charged with attempting to smuggle a huge amount of heroin into the country. The drugs were discovered during a search of the vessel on the River Thames after it arrived from France. The couple claim they knew nothing about the heroin on their boat.
  • Regina v Vennings & Vennings (2)
    E17
    Regina v Vennings & Vennings (2)
  • Regina v Vennings & Vennings (3)
    E18
    Regina v Vennings & Vennings (3)
  • The Eleventh Commandment (1)
    E19
    The Eleventh Commandment (1)Two friends, Linda Mitchell and Rosemary Clayton, are accused of conspiring to shoplift a dress from Hombards Boutique in Fulchester. A store detective claims that Mitchell tried on four dresses in the changing rooms but emerged with only three. Ms Clayton, it is claimed, tried to cause a distraction when Mitchell was challenged about the missing dress by claiming that her purse had been stolen. The store detective claims to have seen the two women put the stolen dress into their car, hidden beneath a raincoat, before Clayton drove away.
  • The Eleventh Commandment (2)
    E20
    The Eleventh Commandment (2)
  • The Eleventh Commandment (3)
    E21
    The Eleventh Commandment (3)
  • The Medium (1)
    E22
    The Medium (1)A spiritualist is accused of fraudulently obtaining money from a widower after performing a series of séances at which he claimed to be making contact with the woman's recently deceased son. The payments for the séances ranged from small cash gifts to a large house. The prosecution claim that the spiritualist took advantage of a vulnerable woman.
  • The Medium (2)
    E23
    The Medium (2)
  • The Medium (3)
    E24
    The Medium (3)
  • Espionage (1)
    E25
    Espionage (1)Foreign Office employee Margaret Terson took top secret documents back to her home while she was dating East German businessman Hans Muller. The prosecution claim that Muller, a communist, was a spy. Miss Terson, who had been under police surveillance during her dalliance with Muller, is now accused of breaching the official secrets Act.
  • Espionage (2)
    E26
    Espionage (2)
  • Espionage (3)
    E27
    Espionage (3)
  • Conspiracy: Regina v Luckhurst and Sawyer (1)
    E28
    Conspiracy: Regina v Luckhurst and Sawyer (1)A radical young journalist and his student girlfriend are accused of conspiring to cause an explosion which rocked the offices of a local company. The prosecution is based on two pieces of evidence found at the couple's flat during a raid - a pair of plimsolls containing fragments of glass matching the glass at the company's offices, and letters written by the couple suggesting that the premises should be attacked.
  • Conspiracy: Regina v Luckhurst and Sawyer (2)
    E29
    Conspiracy: Regina v Luckhurst and Sawyer (2)
  • Conspiracy: Regina v Luckhurst and Sawyer (3)
    E30
    Conspiracy: Regina v Luckhurst and Sawyer (3)
  • Who is Benedetto Trovato? Regina v Starkie (1)
    E31
    Who is Benedetto Trovato? Regina v Starkie (1)Art collector Walter Lander purchased an extremely valuable painting from British collector Alice Starkie. When he announced his purchase to the art world, another collector came forward to claim that he has had the original painting for several years, and that Lander's purchase must be a fake. Alice Starkie is charged with obtaining money by deception, but claims she sold the painting in good faith, believing it to be the original. Is she telling the truth?
  • Who is Benedetto Trovato? Regina v Starkie (2)
    E32
    Who is Benedetto Trovato? Regina v Starkie (2)
  • Who is Benedetto Trovato? Regina v Starkie (3)
    E33
    Who is Benedetto Trovato? Regina v Starkie (3)
  • Criminal Libel: Regina v Maitland (1)
    E34
    Criminal Libel: Regina v Maitland (1)Roddy Maitland, the rising if temperamental star of British tennis, stormed off court during a Wimbledon semi-final. He then drove up to Fulchester to confront Dr. Holt-Matthews, the father of his pregnant girlfriend Gail. On being told that that her pregnancy was now over he attempted suicide in a hotel room by slashing his wrists. However it is Maitland who is now on trial for criminal libel after writing a letter in which the Prosecution allege he maliciously and falsely claimed the doctor to be "an abortionist" and "a murderer". The Defence case is that Dr. Holt-Matthews's callous attitude led him to such a conclusion and that there is no proof Gail had a genuine miscarriage.
  • Criminal Libel: Regina v Maitland (2)
    E35
    Criminal Libel: Regina v Maitland (2)
  • Criminal Libel: Regina v Maitland (3)
    E36
    Criminal Libel: Regina v Maitland (3)

 

  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Take Plex everywhere

Watch free anytime, anywhere, on almost any device.
See the full list of supported devices