Track 29

Directed by Nicolas Roeg
R
1988    90mDrama, Mystery
5.863%42%5.6
A doctor's wife tires of his obsession with model trains, and spends her days wondering about the son she gave up for adoption at birth. While eating at a roadside café, she encounters a British hitchhiker, who turns out to be her son. They spend time together trying to find a bond. The son begins to hate the husband, and the wife begins worrying about the safety of her husband and his train set.
  • Theresa RussellLinda Henry
  • Gary OldmanMartin
  • Christopher LloydHenry Henry
  • Colleen CampArlanda
  • Sandra BernhardNurse Stein
  • Seymour CasselDr. Bernard Fairmont
  • Leon RippyTrucker
  • Vance Colvig Jr.Mr. Ennis
  • Kathryn TomlinsonReceptionist
  • Elijah PerryRedneck
  • Tommy HullCounterman
  • J. Michael HunterWaiter
  • Richard K. OlsenDelegate
  • Ted BarrowOld Man
  • Nicolas RoegDirector
  • Dennis PotterWriter
  • Rick McCallumProducer
  • Denis O'BrienExecutive Producer
  • George HarrisonExecutive Producer
  • David BrockhurstProduction Design

Track 29 Ratings & Reviews

  • PyutarosFebruary 14, 2026
    The tragedy of Track 29 is that even when the camera stays on Linda, it is never actually looking at her; it is a systemic failure of the Bechdel test that renders her a human vessel for the masculine architecture of her own life. She is trapped between Dr. Henry’s clinical, "Low-Temperature" control and the Stranger’s primal, "High-Temperature" aggression, existing only as a reactive input to their conflicting mandates. By manifesting the Stranger as a savior to her boredom, Linda isn't claiming agency but is instead hiring a mental mercenary—a move that proves she has been denied the internal tools to save herself. This is punctuated by the diner scene with Arlanda, where the social "logic-check" fails, confirming that Linda’s reality is a solo loop where even her rebellion is just another male projection. ​This structural erasure extends beyond the script and into the real-world critical reception of the film, which serves as a bitter mirror to the patriarchy on screen. Gary Oldman was universally lauded for his "brave" and "unhinged" performance, rewarded for the same high-temperature unpredictability that makes his character a predator, while Theresa Russell was dragged for her technical choices. The industry punished her for refusing to be the beautiful, compliant vessel the male gaze demands. She chose a jarring, infantile, and hyper-stylized performance by design to reflect a woman whose development was frozen at fifteen. If Russell had been less conventionally attractive, those same choices—the bows, the braces, the high-pitched fragility—would have been praised as "quirky" or "character-driven." Instead, because she didn't satisfy the aesthetic baseline expected of her, her work was dismissed, proving that the critics were just as blinded by the "Stepford" expectation as Henry himself. ​Henry represents the sterile "geometry" of the household, treating Linda like a behavioral error that needs to be sedated rather than a woman with a history. His manipulative nature, seen in his negotiated sexual payout in the car, stands as a cold contrast to the raw, un-negotiated intimacy of the piano scene. Yet, the film falls into the lazy Hollywood trap of pathologizing every expression of fringe desire, insisting that Linda’s psyche must be a "symptom" of her 15-year-old trauma. This robs her of any adult autonomy and forces her memories into a "Grindhouse" filter where she re-edits her own life using cinematic tropes like the Cape Fear bridge. In the end, she doesn't break the cycle; she just swaps a "Daddy" for a "Son," donning the Stepford mask to drive away from one male-dominated script into another, proving her perspective remains the background noise to a masculine crash.

Watch Track 29 Videos

  • Track 29
    Track 29Trailer

Track 29 Trivia

Get Plex on Your Devices

Free on 20+ platforms. Pick yours.
See all supported devices →