トゥモローランド
監督:Brad Bird6.449%50%6.3
17歳のケイシーが見覚えのないピンバッジに触ると、自分が思い描いた別世界へと入り込んだ。バッテリー切れで現実の世界に戻ってきた彼女の前に、不思議な少女アテナが現れる。そしてケイシーにトゥモローランドに戻りたいのなら、フランクという男性を訪ねるよう助言する。
トゥモローランドの評価とレビュー
- Kɱҽƚȥ Tԋҽαƚҽɾ2025年5月27日Good movie! Rotten Tomato reviewers try to hard too be cool. Just a real Plex users two cents here. Good sci-fi movie, good acting, decent story, wasn't cheesy, overall good watch.
- Shaydeknight2026年3月28日Tomorrowland is, oddly enough, based on a Disney theme park area. That already gives you a sense of the problem. The film starts with a place, not an idea, and then tries to reverse engineer meaning into it. The premise, not the plot, is basically Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. The best minds in the world quietly step away and build their own hidden utopia rather than keep fixing a society that refuses to be fixed. Scientists, artists, visionaries - all of them opt out. I kept waiting for a John Galt figure to emerge and he never really does. The idea hangs there, half formed, which is frustrating because it 's actually the most interesting thing in the film. The cast isn't the issue. George Clooney, Britt Robertson, Raffey Cassidy, and Hugh Laurie all do solid work. Everyone is professional. Everyone understands the assignment. Nobody embarrasses themselves. But none of that fixes the core problem, which is that the film keeps pushing a feeling that never quite lands. Technically, it looks great. Big sets, polished effects, shiny futurism. It's visually expensive and you can tell. But the whole thing just sort of repels rather than draws you in. There are very few moments in the film that connect with the viewer. It keeps insisting that you should feel inspired, and instead you start thinking about your own missed chances, the things you never built, the dreams that quietly expired. It's meant to be motivational but ends up feeling accusatory. You don't finish the film wanting to change the world. You leave thinking the world already moved on without you. You didn't get to take the ring to Mordor, nor study at Hogwarts. You're not an Atreides nor an Everdeen. You're just you, and evidently, that's not good enough. At times it felt closer to The Dream of a Ridiculous Man by Fyodor Dostoevsky or The Door in the Wall by H. G. Wells. A glimpse of a better world, then back to reality, and reality feels worse afterwards. I don't think that's quite the effect Brad Bird was aiming for. It's more melancholy than hopeful, more loss than promise. I kept thinking of Oisin seeing Tir na nOg and then having to come back. You get the idea. Once you've seen something you can't attain, everything else feels grey. Yes, I'm saddling my review with emotional baggage. LOL Then there's the audience question. If this is for adults, it's strangely bleak. If it's for kids, it gets uncomfortable for two very specific reasons. First, robots casually disintegrate people. The body count is surprisingly high. No blood, but plenty of murders. It has that Disney trick of sanitizing violence while still piling it up. I wouldn't let a young child watch this. Second, we have an uncomfortable relationship. When he is a child, the main character (Frank Walker) falls in love with Athena, who is a robot built to look like a girl. Those feelings never really go away. Within the logic of the film, fine. She is immortal, not actually a child, and the emotional bond is frozen in time. On screen, though, you still have a middle aged man emotionally tied to someone who looks like a kid. It's awkward. Not scandalous, just a bit, well, odd. Especially in a film that might be watched with children who then ask questions you didn't expect to have to answer. So yes, the film's biggest problem is that it never decides who it's actually for. Adults may find it depressing and kids may find it confusing or a bit too harsh. The message is about hope, but the delivery feels pessimistic. By the end, I found myself half agreeing with Laurie's character. Maybe the world is broken. Maybe we should let it burn and build something better elsewhere. Thanos was right. I don't think the film intends that reading, but it's hard to avoid. It's polished, well acted, full of ideas, and somehow still leaves you cold. Which might be the strangest thing about it. It wants to ignite optimism. Instead, it quietly drains it.
- scottygrahamcracker2026年2月21日Inspiring, and good message
- Spaceman Joe2025年12月7日It was ok. Alright enough or something. George Clooney did a pretty good job. Idk what else to say, I’ll probably forget it exists in a few minutes
- alihoneycutt2025年9月17日Again, one big damned feminist fantasy. You can't get away from it.
- Orl4x2025年8月3日War okay.
- Mister Arn2025年5月22日Overlong scenes made just for 3D, a confusing flashback opening, and characters created for preteens to love, the twelve-year-old me would have enjoyed this much more than I did.
- Charles Phillips2025年2月15日What dreamers are made of
- Xieda2024年11月21日This movie was a lot of fun. And while the underlying theme of ecological and social issues has been done a lot in recent years, Tomorrowland focuses on a different angle than most which is refreshing and hopeful. And if people found it preachy then they're likely not part of the choir.
トゥモローランドを視聴
トゥモローランドに関するトリビア
トゥモローランドは2015年5月20日に公開されました。
トゥモローランドはBrad Birdが監督を務めました。
トゥモローランドの上映時間は2h 10mです。
トゥモローランドはDamon Lindelof, Jeffrey Chernov, Brad Birdがプロデューサーを務めました。
17歳のケイシーが見覚えのないピンバッジに触ると、自分が思い描いた別世界へと入り込んだ。バッテリー切れで現実の世界に戻ってきた彼女の前に、不思議な少女アテナが現れる。そしてケイシーにトゥモローランドに戻りたいのなら、フランクという男性を訪ねるよう助言する。
トゥモローランドの主要人物はCasey Newton (Britt Robertson), Frank Walker (George Clooney), Athena (Raffey Cassidy)です。
トゥモローランドはGと評価されています。
トゥモローランドはサイエンスフィクション, Action, Adventure映画です。
トゥモローランドは、視聴者によって10点満点中5点をつけられています。
トゥモローランドの予算は$1.9億です。
トゥモローランドの興行収入は$2.1億です。