Stanford-fængselseksperimentet
Instrueret af Kyle Patrick AlvarezFilmen er baseret på den sande histoire om Dr. Philip Zimbardo (Billy Crudup), der i 1971 iscenesatte et eksperiment, der skulle undersøge, hvordan mennesker reagerer i pressede situationer. En række forsøgspersoner blev indlogeret i et fiktivt fængsel og inddelt i to grupper: Fangere og fangevogtere. Eksperimentet gik forfærdeligt galt. Der gik nemlig ikke langt tid, før 'fangevogterne' lod den nyfundne autoritet stige dem til hovedet.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet-bedømmelser og anmeldelser
- Manuel Frangis15. april 2025I just watched The Stanford Prison Experiment, and I give it 5 out of 5 stars. This movie hit hard. It is disturbing, intense, and honestly kind of exhausting to sit through — but that is what makes it so powerful. It is based on something that really happened, and the way it plays out feels almost too real. This is not entertainment in the traditional sense. It is something you watch and then sit with afterward. It gets in your head and makes you think about authority, power, and how quickly things can fall apart. The movie is based on the real 1971 psychology experiment conducted at Stanford University by Dr. Philip Zimbardo. A group of male college students volunteered to take part in a study where half of them would be guards and the other half would be prisoners in a mock prison environment. The experiment was supposed to last two weeks. It was shut down in just six days. What happened during those six days is the focus of this movie — and it is chilling. The performances are incredible. Ezra Miller stands out with a raw and emotional performance that shows the toll the experience takes on someone being treated like a prisoner. You can see the shift in him as things start to unravel. Michael Angarano plays one of the guards, and he is terrifying in a way that feels way too believable. His character goes from curious to power-hungry so fast, and you can see how easy it is for someone to fall into that kind of role. Everyone in the cast brings something real, and that is what makes it so hard to watch at times. It does not feel like acting. It feels like you are watching a real situation spiral. Billy Crudup plays Dr. Zimbardo, and he brings this quiet unease to the role. He is supposed to be the one in control, but even he starts to get too deep into the experiment. The way the movie shows how he loses sight of what is ethical is honestly one of the most unsettling parts. It raises a lot of questions about responsibility and how far people are willing to go when no one is stopping them. The pacing is tight and focused. Most of the movie takes place in a few rooms and hallways, but it never feels slow. The tension builds fast, and you can feel it in every scene. The lighting is harsh and the camera work is up close and uncomfortable — and that works. It is supposed to feel claustrophobic. You are supposed to feel stuck in there with them. And you do. I give The Stanford Prison Experiment 5 out of 5 stars because it is brutally effective. It does not try to dramatize or soften the truth. It just shows it for what it was — a powerful and dangerous study that revealed how fast people can lose themselves when given power and no accountability. Overall The Stanford Prison Experiment is a dark and deeply unsettling film that stays with you long after it ends. It is not an easy watch, but it is an important one. It made me think about how fragile morality can be and how quickly things can break when the rules are taken away.
- Nader Ahmed2. februar 2026Strange how humans can live the act.
- Razorbitz29. november 2025A very good psychological film that dramatizes the events effectively. You know its bad when Ezra Miller is the sane one!
- Kelly Marlett19. juni 2025This Film. Effective in my desire for prison abolition, but only because the law is more in favor to incarcerating Blacks than Whites. And still Phill Zimbardo’s brain child is adorned along with him. The experience of working for companies in America make the study feel all too familiar in those context as I can now recall my I-9 contractual employments. Power and Abuse have an Ivy League blueprint now. Science backs that blueprint up to be effective in a society that cherishes it. How will this knowledge continue to be used is the concern.
- Michele Luna22. februar 2025I enjoyed the movie. Although , I watched it on Plex and the movie was cut off right near the end 😔
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet-trivia
- juli 2015 blev Stanford-fængselseksperimentet udgivet.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet blev instrueret af Kyle Patrick Alvarez.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet har en spilletid på 2 t 1 m.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet blev produceret af Lizzie Friedman, Brent Emery, Lauren Bratman, Karen Lauder, Greg Little.
Filmen er baseret på den sande histoire om Dr. Philip Zimbardo (Billy Crudup), der i 1971 iscenesatte et eksperiment, der skulle undersøge, hvordan mennesker reagerer i pressede situationer. En række forsøgspersoner blev indlogeret i et fiktivt fængsel og inddelt i to grupper: Fangere og fangevogtere. Eksperimentet gik forfærdeligt galt. Der gik nemlig ikke langt tid, før 'fangevogterne' lod den nyfundne autoritet stige dem til hovedet.
Nøglepersonerne i Stanford-fængselseksperimentet er Dr. Philip Zimbardo (Billy Crudup), Christopher Archer (Michael Angarano), Daniel Culp / Prisoner 8612 (Ezra Miller).
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet er bedømt 15.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet er en Thriller, Drama, Biography-film.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet har en publikumsbedømmelse på 7.5 ud af 10.
Stanford-fængselseksperimentet har indtjent 644 t US$ ved billetlugen.