R
2021    2h 7mDrama, Western
6.894%76%6.7
Charismatic rancher Phil Burbank inspires fear and awe in those around him. When his brother brings home a new wife and her son, Phil torments them until he finds himself exposed to the possibility of love.
Directed by Jane Campion
  • Benedict CumberbatchPhil Burbank
  • Kodi Smit-McPheePeter Gordon
  • Kirsten DunstRose Gordon
  • Jesse PlemonsGeorge Burbank
  • Thomasin McKenzieLola
  • Geneviève LemonMrs. Lewis
  • Keith CarradineThe Governor
  • Frances ConroyOld Lady
  • Kenneth RadleyBarkeep
  • Sean KeenanSven
  • George MasonCricket
  • Ramontay McConnellTheo
  • David DenisAngelo
  • Cohen HollowayBobby
  • Max MataJuan
  • Josh OwenLee
  • Alistair SewellJock
  • Eddie CampbellStan
  • Alice EnglertBuster
  • Bryony SkillingtonQueenie
  • Joe GDecember 29, 2025
    A beautifully shot film with confident direction and striking cinematography. The score does much of the heavy lifting, generating tension, fear, and sexual unease with remarkable precision. It creates the constant impression that something important is unfolding, all without ever showing much of anything at all. Nearly all action, context, or moments that would traditionally constitute dramatic interest occur offscreen. What remains is suggestion rather than substance. It’s difficult to say whether there is a complete story here, or even a clear point, beyond atmosphere itself. And yet, because of the score and visual control, what is shown feels charged, consequential, and heavy with meaning, even when nothing ultimately arrives. In that sense, the film functions as an experiment: a demonstration of how a director can manipulate audience emotion through craft alone. Individually, the elements are exceptional—acting, cinematography, music, and writing all operate at a high level. Collectively, however, they never coalesce into something substantial.
  • mickerdooOctober 22, 2025
    Although beautifully shot, I didn’t connect with any of the characters. Plemons felt underutilized and I didn’t like the Phil character.
  • Shamus2kNovember 13, 2024
    Full of impending doom and dread, but an excellent Western showcasing Cumberbatch's ever expanding range as an actor.
  • jackmeatAugust 29, 2025
    My quick rating - 5.5/10. Guess I'll get one more in for #Oscars2022. I know I am going against the grain here, but this movie felt so "forced" to be important. And what is there important subject to touch upon? Homosexuality? That does say #Oscars2022 and not #Oscars1987. I had to pick some arbitrary year since this is NOT some new and taboo topic. This isn't because I have something against that, if it were actually the point of the movie. It, just like many other points of this movie, seems to be more just thrown in. Jane Campion does a great job directing this flick, most likely the highlight of the whole production. But the story is basically two brothers, one being Benedict Cumberbatch playing the more "cowboy" role of tough guy, which is a stretch in how he portrays it, and the other being Jesse Plemons. He is more of the educated college man married to a drunkard, played by Kirsten Dunst. I am naming everyone off since nearly everyone is up for an award this year. The alpha cowboy constantly pushes his brother around and sees his wife and her awkward son, Kodi Smit-McPhee, as an annoyance and constantly belittles them all. Then, out of the blu,e this attitude changes and KSM and Cumberbatch become buddies. It is hardly explained in the slightest and just doesn't fit. For some reason, KSM is also up for supporting actor, but between him and Plemons, I really prefer the latter. KSM spends most of his time onscreen looking out of place, silent, and your one clue about sexuality, caught looking at a magazine with naked men. Again, just stuck in there to point something out, no lead up to or a why? Now onto the pacing of this. At 128 minutes, it is so slow, I felt as though it was 4 hours long. So little is ever going on. We don't need gunbattles and stagecoach robberies, but give us literally something. Maybe some insight into the characters themselves. Why is Dunst a drunk? The scene of her failing to play piano for everyone is supposed to be some form of a sign, but it is just there and moves on. They don't even touch upon her issue until later on in some ramble, which again seemed thrown in. But the PC correct, oh, wait, you NOW say "woke" crowd are trying to force us to like this because it claims focusing on sexuality is artistic, but to me, personally, in today, it should be more of a detriment to think that is what makes something artistic. Now, it is just society and has been for quite a long time. With all the Oscars this is nominated for, for the most part, I won't be rooting for many of them that don't involve behind-the-camera accolades. Maybe Plemons, since his work in the first half or so was quite good until the second half, where the whole thing basically fell apart. To me, this was made for one reason only: to try and win gold statues, and in doing so, they all forgot to bring us an actually well-put-together movie. I know I said a lot more bad than good, but when you are among the top 10 of the year, you expect not to have to make sure others know it just doesn't belong in the same category.

Watch The Power of the Dog Videos

  • The Power Of The Dog
    The Power Of The DogTrailer
  • The Power Of The Dog (Teaser Trailer 1)
    The Power Of The Dog (Teaser Trailer 1)Trailer
  • The Power Of The Dog: Dancing
    The Power Of The Dog: DancingScene
  • The Power Of The Dog: Flowers
    The Power Of The Dog: FlowersScene
  • The Power Of The Dog: Music Duel
    The Power Of The Dog: Music DuelScene

The Power of the Dog Trivia