R
2006    1h 44mHorror, Mystery
6.540%6.5
Watch on Apple TV
On Apple TV
Buy $3.99Ad
A detective investigates a series of murders. A possible serial killer might be on a rampage, since they all are in the same vicinity and by the same method, but as the evidence points toward the detective as the prime suspect, a ghost in red follows him, and he begins to question his identity. His realization of what seems to have really happened results in something much more sinister and larger in scope, and it leaves his psyche scarred.
Directed by Kiyoshi Kurosawa
  • Koji YakushoNoboru Yoshioka
  • Manami KonishiHarue Nimura
  • Tsuyoshi IharaToru Miyaji
  • Riona HazukiWoman in Red
  • Joe OdagiriDr. Takagi
  • Hiroyuki HirayamaDetective Sakurai
  • Kaoru OkunukiMiyuki Yabe
  • Ikuji NakamuraShoichi Sakuma
  • Hironobu NomuraSeiji Onoda
  • Jin MurakiCoroner Furuya
  • Ryo TanakaShin'ya Ichikawa
  • Ryo KaseMan on Boat
  • Ikuyo IshiiMother of Woman in Red
  • Itsuki HoshiInfant
  • Tadashi SuzukiDoctor
  • Megumi KitaoNurse
  • Naoko MiyakeNurse
  • Yoko ChosokabeNurse
  • Kenkichi WatanabeCounselor
  • Kaoru MizukiReiko Shibata's Mother
  • Patrick Wai
    Patrick WaiAugust 2, 2026
    After revisiting Kiyoshi Kurosawa's work, I found myself appreciating *Pulse* even more. Unfortunately, *Retribution* doesn't reach the same heights. Like many of Kurosawa's films, everything is drenched in decay. The buildings are run-down, the streets feel abandoned, and the entire movie carries a grim, almost suffocating atmosphere. Even the sets feel stripped to their bare essentials, almost like minimalist theater stages. Whether by design or budget, the world feels cold, empty, and lifeless. To the film's credit, Kurosawa still demonstrates flashes of visual brilliance. Several compositions feel almost manga-like, with striking geometry and carefully framed images that linger in your mind long after the scene ends. The acting is solid across the board. No one gives a bad performance, and the cast does a good job grounding an otherwise strange story. What didn't work for me was the storytelling. There's a fine line between ambiguity and confusion. *Retribution* crosses it too often. I enjoy movies that leave room for interpretation. *Pulse* is a great example. It withholds answers but still gives the audience enough to piece together its emotional and narrative logic. *Retribution*, on the other hand, becomes so vague that I eventually found myself looking up an online explanation just to understand what literally happened. For me, that's where the mystery stops being rewarding and starts becoming frustrating. Another issue is the repeated use of Kurosawa's signature visual trick: holding a wide shot while a ghostly figure quietly appears somewhere in the background. It's genuinely creepy the first few times because your eye discovers the figure on its own. The problem is that the movie leans on the technique so often that it begins to lose its power. What starts as unsettling gradually becomes expected, and once you start looking around every frame for the hidden figure, much of the surprise disappears. Interestingly, the film contains almost no traditional jump scares. Instead, it relies on mood, silence, and slow-building unease. That's usually a strength in Japanese horror, but here the atmosphere isn't quite enough to compensate for a story that remains frustratingly opaque. I wanted to like *Retribution* more than I did. The ingredients are all there: an interesting premise, memorable imagery, capable performances, and Kurosawa's unmistakable talent for creating dread. But the film never quite pulls those pieces together into a satisfying whole. Sometimes leaving questions unanswered makes a movie richer. Sometimes it simply leaves the audience outside the story. For me, *Retribution* lands on the wrong side of that line.

Be the first

Start a Discussion and see where it goes.

Watch Retribution Videos

  • Retribution
    RetributionTrailer

Retribution Trivia