Una casa llena de dinamita
Directed by Kathryn BigelowCuando un misil sin identificar es lanzado contra EE. UU., se desata una carrera a contrarreloj por descubrir al responsable y decidir cómo responder.
Where to Watch Una casa llena de dinamita
Una casa llena de dinamita Ratings & Reviews
- Wilson Girardi16 de abril de 2026Hey, I haven't been to Chicago yet, c'mon!
- PlexserverMakani24 de octubre de 2025my ex lives in Chicago
- samhill9225 de octubre de 2025Worst ending of a film in modern history.
- epr475 de abril de 2026The premise is initially quite engaging, but quickly deteriorates into drivel. The writer and director rely on laughably naive assumptions to promote the idea that the US defense system and its operators are wildly ineffective and incompetent. To the extent that it's difficult to be entertained by what's left.
- ghostsquad18 de febrero de 2026I liked the drama, the perspective change was good, and interesting, but having it change twice, it was basically watching a 40 minute movie 3 times, with no resolution.
- Rikonda26 de octubre de 2025EIGHT SUGARS?!
- rg940025 de octubre de 2025The first 35 minutes of this movie is absolutely fantastic. Pulse pounding, high tension, heartbeat score with strong acting that drives home the impact of what is happening. I really thought I was watching something special. And then...it cuts to black. And then we start over again. Then it does it again after the next third, cutting back at the same point before looping back to the beginning. I was baffled by this decision on so many levels. First, the 3 different perspectives aren't actually that different from each other. It isn't like we are suddenly seeing a different side to the events (which would have been cool). It isn't like we are following 3 specific different characters. Each third follows a ton of characters, and often times, the 2 loops are repeating the same events and becoming very repetitive. At a high level, yes, there is a slight thematic shift in each act. However, there is no reason that Bigelow should have looped each time. These moments and themes could have easily been woven into a chronological telling of this story. The looping causes the tension to screech to a halt, and for something that has such a heart-pounding pace, it is crazy that I ended up starting to feel bored in the last third because of how repetitive it was getting. Yes, there are a ton of famous actors and actresses in this. At one point near the end, I exclaimed because yet another familiar face showed up for like 5 minutes, and I have no idea why. I suspect that Bigelow wanted so many stars, and so she filmed this in such a way that she could include them without having to have them all on set at the same time. That's the only reason to structure this movie so poorly. That leads me to another failure of this storytelling. I actually thought the characters were compelling and fascinating in the first third. It follows a diverse number of them, already a large amount of characters, and I thought we were getting interesting mini-arcs for so many of them. Then, they all disappear as the perspective shifts, and the movie never resolves their stories. Maybe that was part of the point, showing how so many human stories get lost in such an event. However, I found it deeply unsatisfying. Finally, I need to talk about the ending. After all this looping and teasing what happens...the movie cuts to black. I don't want to talk spoilers, but suffice to say, it is one of the most unsatisfying endings to a movie that I can recall in recent memory. It makes me wonder what this movie was even trying to accomplish. I don't understand the decision-making or intent at all. It's maybe one of the most drastic changes of opinions I have had in a movie from its beginning to the ending. To be honest, I am honestly livid at how much wasted potential and talent there is in this movie. It had such a strong start and could have easily been one of the best movies I've seen this year. Instead, it is something worse than a bad movie. It's a movie that should have been good but squandered its opportunities and ended up making a shocking number of bafflingly dumb decisions. What a waste.
- PapaHamzeh9 de febrero de 2026I think, along with everyone else, the third act was what made the movie stumble. Why did we need it when the first two were so good and the third never really lived up to the tremendous problem POTUS would face? sort of took the air out of it, no? First two acts though? Makes you feel not so good about the world.
- Jefferson Bittencourt2 de febrero de 2026I really like Bigelow's direction!! Here the tension, in fact, is a great reflection on the tension of a war of great proportions. The ending didn't bother me, because I don't think the movie wanted to cause surprise. It reflects the degree of tension from all points of view.
- Hehzeus24 de octubre de 2025A movie that exemplifies the stupidity of American foreign policy by creating a false premise and beating the viewer with it until they just want to see the nukes drop
- Enid&Richard26 de octubre de 2025We found the film to be quite unsatisfactory. It began with promise but quickly declined, never quite recovering. What a regrettable use of top tier talent. The ending, in our opinion, is among one of the most poorly conceived in recent cinematic history. This once again leads us to question the validity of the ratings system.
- G2 de noviembre de 2025A 40 minute movie you get to watch 3 times with no actual resolution at the end.
- elsparko9 de noviembre de 2025Fu ck that ending
- MrTrivet28 de enero de 2026A House of Dynamite keeps viewers on edge throughout, giving the impression that a fuse is burning and an explosion is inevitable, yet the actual blast never occurs, neither literally nor metaphorically. The concept of the film remains fresh and engaging for most of the runtime before the narrative starts to repeat itself and loses momentum. I appreciated the technique of showing events from multiple perspectives, though not all of them held my attention equally; some scenes seemed to revisit the same storylines without offering a new viewpoint. While the ending feels flat, the film is supported by excellent performances. The most compelling aspect is the behind-the-scenes look at a crisis - observing how people at the pinnacle of power react to an event that could change the world, balancing political expectations with personal fears for their loved ones and themselves.
- Szafran2 de noviembre de 2025Where is the rest of the movie?
Una casa llena de dinamita Trivia
Una casa llena de dinamita was released on 9 de octubre de 2025.
Una casa llena de dinamita was directed by Kathryn Bigelow.
Una casa llena de dinamita has a runtime of 1h 52min.
Una casa llena de dinamita was produced by Kathryn Bigelow, Noah Oppenheim, Greg Shapiro.
Cuando un misil sin identificar es lanzado contra EE. UU., se desata una carrera a contrarreloj por descubrir al responsable y decidir cómo responder.
The key characters in Una casa llena de dinamita are POTUS (Idris Elba), Captain Olivia Walker (Rebecca Ferguson), Deputy National Security Advisor Jake Baerington (Gabriel Basso).
Una casa llena de dinamita is rated 12.
Una casa llena de dinamita is a Drama, Suspense, Bélica film.
Una casa llena de dinamita has an audience rating of 7.8 out of 10.
Una casa llena de dinamita has made 181 mil US$ at the box office.