A
1957    1h 37minDrama, Crimen
9.0100%97%8.6
Watch on Prime Video
On Prime Video
30 Days FreeAd
Tras escuchar todos los testimonios y valorar las pruebas presentadas, un jurado popular compuesto por doce hombres tiene que decidir, por unanimidad, si absuelve o condena a muerte a un joven acusado de haber matado a su padre. Al principio, once están completamente convencidos de su culpabilidad y se inclinan por la condena, pero el que discrepa empieza a plantear dudas razonables que, poco a poco, van resquebrajando la inicial seguridad de los demás.
Directed by Sidney Lumet

Where to Watch 12 hombres sin piedad

  • Martin BalsamJuror 1
  • John FiedlerJuror 2
  • Lee J. CobbJuror 3
  • E.G. MarshallJuror 4
  • Jack KlugmanJuror 5
  • Edward BinnsJuror 6
  • Jack WardenJuror 7
  • Henry FondaJuror 8 / Productor
  • Joseph SweeneyJuror 9
  • Ed BegleyJuror 10
  • George VoskovecJuror 11
  • Robert WebberJuror 12
  • Rudy BondJudge (uncredited)
  • Tom GormanStenographer (uncredited)
  • James KellyGuard (uncredited)
  • Billy NelsonCourt Clerk (uncredited)
  • Walter StockerMan Waiting for Elevator (uncredited)
  • John SavocaDefendant (uncredited)
  • Sidney LumetDirector
  • Reginald RoseGuión / Productor
  • PaxProtocol14 de mayo de 2026
    12 Angry Men is a reminder that justice depends on at least one person refusing to go along with the crowd.
  • David Browning3 de abril de 2026
    This is cinema, at least to me. I enjoy fast-paced action, tense thrillers, dazzling CGI, and big-budget spectacle as much as anyone. But films like 12 Angry Men are something else entirely, quiet, deliberate, and executed with scalpel-like precision, yet still carrying a message that feels just as relevant today as it did nearly 70 years ago. Everyone who helped create it may be gone, but their work endures, immortalised in a true masterpiece. It’s easily one of my favourite films, up there with The Lord of the Rings. I revisit it almost every year, and it never loses its impact. It explores both the strengths and flaws of the legal system while reflecting something deeply human about who we are. What makes it even more special is how much it achieves with so little. Like Locke and Buried, it proves you don’t need scale to create something powerful. Just great writing, strong performances, and a clear vision. I wish we saw more films like this. Everyone should experience it at least once in their lifetime.
  • qmechan23 de enero de 2025
    Twelve jurors, stuck fast in a cage, As their frustrations make way to rage, One must have his say, But to get his way, Eleven more he must assuage
  • Cubane19 de febrero de 2026
    Not the most entertaining movie by modern standards, being from the 1950s. Were the events depicted to actually take place in a real deliberation, they would surely result in a mistrial. But they discuss this movie in law school simply because no other film will ever do a better job of confronting the flaws and extolling the brilliance of the jury trial system. May we all have the right to face our accuser.
  • Jesse Ashmead9 de enero de 2026
    For a fella born in this century I believed I wasn't the target audience for this movie but with the amount of poitive reviews i couldn't ignore it. It amazed me how, with good writing a film from when my grandfather was a child, can still be so thought provoking in this day and most likely will continue to be
  • J3schk431 de enero de 2026
    A classic set-up in the sense that the whole movie plays inside a single room. Very well done.
  • naqiharsa2 de enero de 2026
    what an epic film it fells like the audience was brought into the case
  • Jakeys24 de diciembre de 2025
    A classic for a reason. Simple, engaging story with a message about prejudice and why we have presumption of innocence.
  • Teodor9530 de noviembre de 2025
    A masterpiece! This movie holds strong even today and it's a must see in my opinion. The acting is great and the stakes (a man's life) and how seriously people take it are very well presented. It tackles prejudice, racism, personal bias and much more in a very tasteful manner.
  • DJS71k15 de septiembre de 2025
    still Bangs
  • flavo4323 de noviembre de 2025
    12 Angry Men is one of those rare films that completely reshapes how you think about something as everyday—and daunting—as jury duty. After watching it, I genuinely wanted to sit on a jury someday. The idea of being part of a group responsible for another person’s fate suddenly felt extraordinary, almost noble. The original 1957 film is by far the best version, carried by some of the finest method actors of the era. Henry Fonda’s calm determination, Lee J. Cobb’s explosive emotional unraveling, and the layered performances from the rest of the cast turn a single room into a battlefield of logic, prejudice, and conscience. With nothing more than dialogue, body language, and escalating tension, the film becomes an intense examination of justice and morality. Its simplicity is its power. 12 Angry Men remains a timeless reminder that ordinary people can make profound decisions—if they’re willing to question their own assumptions.
  • Lord_Naitsabes2 de febrero de 2025
    lives up to the name
  • Sam16 de noviembre de 2025
    more people on juries need to watch this and research "jury nullification"
  • johnrodan2 de noviembre de 2025
    A sweaty movie. Explores the meaning of reasonable doubt and how our biases shape us.
  • TomVader5 de octubre de 2025
    I was surprised how good this was. There is almost not a single word in this whole movie that doesn't need to be there. It retained my interest the entire time.

Watch 12 hombres sin piedad Videos

  • 12 Angry Men
    12 Angry MenTráiler
  • 12 Angry Men (Trailer 1)
    12 Angry Men (Trailer 1)Tráiler
  • A Very Unusual Knife
    A Very Unusual KnifeEscena

12 hombres sin piedad Trivia