Warlock
Warlock - Satans Sohn
Im Jahr 1689 ist der Hexenjäger Giles Redferne einem Hexenmeister, dem sogenannten Warlock, auf den Fersen. Dabei öffnet sich ein Portal in einem Wirbelsturm, das die beiden ins 20. Jahrhundert katapultiert. Hier ist der Warlock auf der Suche nach drei unheiligen Gegenständen, die - zusammengefügt - die Macht besitzen, ein Tor zur Hölle aufzustoßen. Redferne versucht unterdessen mit allen Mitteln, zu dem finsteren Magier zu gelangen, bevor dieser das Schicksal der Welt besiegelt und sie in ewige Verdammnis stürzt. Dabei erfährt er Unterstützung von Kassandra, die ihrerseits selbst vom Warlock verflucht wurde und deshalb hinter ihm und ihrem gestohlenen Amulett her ist. Gemeinsam reisen sie nach Boston, um dort den Hexer zu stellen und ihn zu richten...
Richard rezensierte
3. August 2025•
In 1691 Boston, a warlock is sentenced to death but escapes into the future, our present with dark magic. He’s on a quest to find the three pieces of the Devil’s Bible, which contains the true name of God. If he succeeds, he can un-create the world. Hot on his heels, a relentless witch hunter and a woman whose life he destroyed.
🧨 What Works
Julian Sands Is Magnetic: His performance as the Warlock is eerie, elegant, and oddly charismatic.
Richard E. Grant Steals Scenes: As the witch hunter, he brings intensity and a touch of humor.
Time Travel With a Gothic Twist: The blend of colonial witchcraft and modern-day settings is surprisingly effective.
Atmospheric Score and Visuals: It’s got that late-80s horror vibe—moody lighting, synthy music, and practical effects.
😬 What Doesn’t
The Sequels Are Forgettable: Stick with the original. Later entries lose the charm.
Some Effects Feel Dated: It’s 1989, so expect a few cheesy moments.
Pacing Can Lag: The middle act drags a bit before ramping up again.
⭐ Final Thoughts
Warlock is a cult classic that blends horror, fantasy, and time travel with flair. It’s not perfect, but it’s stylish, spooky, and anchored by strong performances. If you’re into supernatural thrillers with a vintage edge, this one’s worth conjuring up.
Richard rezensierte
3. August 2025•
In 1691 Boston, a warlock is sentenced to death but escapes into the future, our present with dark magic. He’s on a quest to find the three pieces of the Devil’s Bible, which contains the true name of God. If he succeeds, he can un-create the world. Hot on his heels, a relentless witch hunter and a woman whose life he destroyed.
🧨 What Works
Julian Sands Is Magnetic: His performance as the Warlock is eerie, elegant, and oddly charismatic.
Richard E. Grant Steals Scenes: As the witch hunter, he brings intensity and a touch of humor.
Time Travel With a Gothic Twist: The blend of colonial witchcraft and modern-day settings is surprisingly effective.
Atmospheric Score and Visuals: It’s got that late-80s horror vibe—moody lighting, synthy music, and practical effects.
😬 What Doesn’t
The Sequels Are Forgettable: Stick with the original. Later entries lose the charm.
Some Effects Feel Dated: It’s 1989, so expect a few cheesy moments.
Pacing Can Lag: The middle act drags a bit before ramping up again.
⭐ Final Thoughts
Warlock is a cult classic that blends horror, fantasy, and time travel with flair. It’s not perfect, but it’s stylish, spooky, and anchored by strong performances. If you’re into supernatural thrillers with a vintage edge, this one’s worth conjuring up.
