Die Geschichte von Prinz Vladimir aus dem 15. Jahrhundert, der nach dem Tod seiner geliebten Frau Gott verflucht und in einen Vampir verwandelt wird. Später, im London des 19. Jahrhunderts, entdeckt er die Doppelgängerin seiner Frau und verdammt sich selbst, indem er ihr nachstellt.
Dracula - Die Auferstehung ansehen bei
- fhe8226. Juni 2026Drácula: A Love Tale has great special effects, and visually there are moments where the movie looks genuinely impressive. The actors are fine too. Not amazing, not terrible, just okay. But the real problem is the story. How many Dracula movies are we going to get? It feels like every single year someone decides we need another version, another tragic origin, another romantic curse, another “this is how Dracula became Dracula” angle. At this point, it is tiring. The same old reboot story has been done so many times that even good visuals cannot make it feel fresh anymore. The movie may look good, but the story feels exhausted before it even begins. Dracula is one of the most iconic characters in horror, but even icons need a break. Please stop. No more Dracula origin films. Stop already.
- Darren Webster18. September 2025Look, yes, it's another retelling and it takes inspiration from what's come before, but lest ye forget, what's come before was based off the book as is this and it's done quite well. Luc took some agency with the story we all know all too well at this point and had some fun with it. Honestly, this was absolutely fantastic work by Luc and the entire cast. While there ahs alwasy been a theme of love within the story of Dracula, nobody has taken the time to really make it into a full fledged love story. This does that, if not a bit dark and brooding. Even if you've seein every film that's come before this one, it's still 100% worth taking the time to watch this re-telling.
- El'Jakod Odinsson31. Mai 2026A wretched, baffling Dracula movie that wants badly to stand near Coppola’s 1992 version and instead trips face-first into the crypt. The changes from both Stoker and Coppola are almost all worse: no Van Helsing, no Renfield, no bats, wolves, mist, running-water problem, sun problem, or religious-iconography problem. Instead, Dracula apparently gets magic perfume. Even Danny Elfman is wasted, which feels like a crime of its own. The costuming is occasionally good, the castle looks cool, and then the movie goes right back to being dull, muted, and aggressively stupid. The gargoyles raise questions the film has no interest in answering. Caleb Landry Jones is terrible here, and that accent is a full-scale disaster. My dog could do better, and my dog does not speak. This is worse than Dracula 2000, which is not a sentence anyone should have to write. I gave it half a star, and even that feels generous. Negative ratings may need to exist.
- Arniox28. Mai 2026I think it's good. Another Dracula story to add to list. This one much less about horror, and more about grief and the depth of loss. It's quite beautiful in this regard. How deep can love go, and how long can a man suffer in grief when his life is endless. It's a sad and interesting question.
- trrs11. Mai 2026This is a interesting story because on one had you got a bit of the historical figure vlad the impaler mixed in with Dracula who’s fictional. However this movie in particular seems to have a problem trying to balance both in some instances. It’s not a terrible movie but it focuses more on the romance as opposed to the mechanics of how Dracula came to be. Knowing that it’s suppose to be a romance I’d forgive it a bit however I do feel like you do need to see some more backstory of how Dracula came to better understand his internal struggles which this movie sorta lacks. Bottom line it’s a good movie overall just not an excellent movie. Worth watching but sadly nothing to add to a rotation of movies to revisit. 3 1/2 out of 5
- James Saenz10. Januar 2026“i forbid you from killing yourself beneath my window!” “so you’d prefer i die further away?” the best parts are easily the costume and set design. everything else is kind of meh, a strange amalgamation of the source material and previous adaptations that doesn’t really achieve what its predecessors did (pales in comparison to the romance of coppola’s dracula, what humor is there doesn’t land as well as mckay’s renfield, and it lacks the atmosphere of herzog’s or eggers’ nosferatu adaptations). kind of the cw version of dracula, which isn’t necessarily bad but it’s also not something i would come back to when i have far better options.
- Shaydeknight13. Dezember 2025This new version of Dracula is an object lesson in how to drain a classic of its vitality without delivering anything fresh in return. The film is, fundamentally, a retelling of a retelling, far more indebted to Francis Ford Coppola's 1992 adaptation than to Bram Stoker's novel. What emerges is not an homage but the fuzzy mimeograph of someone else's vision, blurred by its own lack of conviction. The result is tedious. The film is never frightening. Its attempts at horror have all the menace of a baby drinking from a bottle. Narrative beats land with a dull thud, and the pacing suffers from long, bland stretches that fail to build tension or atmosphere. Caleb Landry Jones, as Dracula, is a puzzling piece of casting. He does competent work with what he is given, but he spends much of the film looking profoundly out of place. The costuming does him no favours: despite his height, he seems like an adolescent wearing his father's oversized suit, topped with an inexplicably silly hat. The effect undercuts any sense of menace or regality. For a character who should command the frame simply by existing in it, he has no presence whatsoever. This is, without exaggeration, the most insipid Dracula committed to film. Christoph Waltz delivers precisely what audiences have come to expect from him. He is always a pleasure to watch, even when the material around him is uninspired, and he brings a professionalism that briefly punctures the monotony. Production design is one of the few bright spots. The sets are attractive, thoughtfully crafted, and occasionally suggest a more interesting film struggling to emerge from underneath the rest of the enterprise. Unfortunately, direction from Luc Besson does little to elevate the material. Honestly, he hasn't produced anything truly remarkable in more than three decades, and Dracula continues that trajectory. The film lacks a distinct creative vision and the end product feels dated, tiresome, and wholly unnecessary. Ultimately, the film is a waste of time: uninspired, not at all scary, and forgettable. It contributes nothing to the long lineage of adaptations and fails to entertain. It is a retelling so diluted that it barely leaves a trace.
Plex auf deine Abspielgeräte
Kostenlos auf 20+ Plattformen. Wähle deine.Dracula - Die Auferstehung Trivia
Dracula - Die Auferstehung wurde am 30. Juli 2025 veröffentlicht.
Regie in Dracula - Die Auferstehung führte(n) Luc Besson.
Dracula - Die Auferstehung hat eine Spielzeit von 2 Std., 10 Min..
Dracula - Die Auferstehung wurde produziert von Virginie Besson-Silla, Luc Besson.
Die Geschichte von Prinz Vladimir aus dem 15. Jahrhundert, der nach dem Tod seiner geliebten Frau Gott verflucht und in einen Vampir verwandelt wird. Später, im London des 19. Jahrhunderts, entdeckt er die Doppelgängerin seiner Frau und verdammt sich selbst, indem er ihr nachstellt.
Die Hauptcharaktere in Dracula - Die Auferstehung sind Vlad / Dracula (Caleb Landry Jones), Elisabeta / Mina (Zoë Bleu Sidel), Priest (Christoph Waltz).
Dracula - Die Auferstehung ist bewertet mit 16.
Dracula - Die Auferstehung ist eine Fantasy, Horror, Liebesfilm Film.
Dracula - Die Auferstehung hat eine Benutzerbewertung von 8.2 von 10.
Dracula - Die Auferstehung hatte ein Budget von 52 Mio. $.
Dracula - Die Auferstehung erzielte Einnhamen von 42,4 Mio. $ an den Kinokassen.