Wargames
Instrueret af John BadhamSelvom David stadig er en dreng er han noget at en troldmand, når det gælder computere. Lidt tilfældigt hacker han sig ind i Pentagon og begynder på at spille Global Thermonuclear Warfar mod computeren. Det viser sig snart at den tager spillet meget alvorligt og snart er godt i gang med at starte 3. Verdenskrig. Men kan computeren nu forstå, at Davis kun spillede for sjov?
Wargames-bedømmelser og anmeldelser
- Gianni Cavuoto29. december 2025This really neat throwback from the 80s is packed with action, intrigue and solid ideas from front to back. At no point does it let up. I think the movie was ahead of its time in that many people were not aware that most of this stuff was not science fiction but science fact….I certainly wasn't aware as a teenager watching this. It's worth a watch if not for a stroll down memory lane for us older folks but maybe for a younger generation to show us where we came from in many aspects.
- Specter241213. maj 2025Classic and unmissable
- Gerard18. oktober 2025Holds up brilliantly, really great movie
- sti5313. december 2025"Have you ever heard about the word tumulus?"
- Cubane27. oktober 2025Holds up pretty damn well considering its age, and the highly theoretical nature of the technology discussed at the time. It's great to see tech bros completely disregard the warnings this movie extolls; rest assured the US taxpayer will be forced to foot the bill eventually.
- flavo436. december 2025WarGames (1983) is a quintessential Cold War thriller that blends teenage rebellion with global stakes. The film follows David Lightman, a curious high school hacker who accidentally accesses a military supercomputer and nearly triggers nuclear war. What makes the story so compelling is its balance of youthful mischief with sobering political tension, capturing both the excitement and danger of early computer technology. The hacking sequences, while dated by today’s standards, were realistic for the era and added authenticity to the narrative. Themes of anti-war sentiment and the fallibility of human and machine decision-making resonate strongly, making the film thought-provoking as well as entertaining. Matthew Broderick’s performance brings charm and relatability to the protagonist, while the escalating suspense keeps viewers on edge. WarGames succeeds as both a cautionary tale and an intense thriller, reminding audiences of the fragile line between play and catastrophe.
- Admin18. oktober 2025Never gets old, I have seen it many times.
- rafciok31. august 2025Great Classic adventure from the 80s
- SealTeamOne4. august 2025My 7th graders watched it and were riveted. If you can get Gen Alpha to stop and pay attention, the movie is a gem.
- adecaria24. juli 2025AI supercomputer in the hands of the US government threatening World War 3 is an eerily prescient reminder that... Matthew Broderick will always look and act younger than he is. Perfectly unrealistic classic!
- mickerdoo13. juli 2025No big deal. Just accidentally hacked us to extinction. Premise is funny but execution is entertaining. Love Broderick. Coleman is cute.
- jack2760011. maj 2025One of the best cold war era films and one of the best 80s movies ever.
- CrossCutCritic29. marts 2025The Only Winning Move --- Some stories shout warnings; others whisper them, even under the noise of their surface. WarGames, released in 1983 at the height of Cold War anxiety, is a film about nuclear weapons, about computers and teenagers and military mistakes. But beneath its flashing consoles and high-stakes hacking, there is something deeper — a meditation on pride, limits, and the hard lesson that some victories must be refused in order for life to survive. It is, in its way, a parable. And if we listen carefully, we might hear beneath it the faint heartbeat of a cross. --- David Lightman (Matthew Broderick) is a bright, reckless teenager who stumbles into something he cannot control. In search of early access to unreleased video games, he accidentally hacks into the NORAD military computer system and engages an artificial intelligence designed to run war simulations. But what begins as a game spirals quickly toward global catastrophe, as the computer — unable to distinguish simulation from reality — prepares to launch an irreversible nuclear strike. David’s youthful arrogance is infectious. We sympathize with his playful curiosity, his easy belief that he can outwit the system. But WarGames is not interested in glorifying the cleverness of its hero. It is a film about what happens when cleverness fails. The escalation is fast, and sickeningly plausible. What begins in play becomes terror. The war that man tried to contain in algorithms and screens threatens to burn the world to ash. And in the end, the solution is not more power. It is not a smarter attack. It is not domination. It is a simple, terrible realization: There are battles you cannot win. There are wars where victory itself is defeat. And sometimes, the only way to survive is to lay down your weapons. --- If this sounds strangely familiar, it should. It is the scandal at the heart of the Christian cross: That the ultimate enemy — death — cannot be defeated by force of arms. That the true victory is not conquest, but surrender. That salvation comes not by mastering death, but by dying through it, into new life. David’s journey mirrors, faintly but truly, the movement from human pride into humility. He must learn that not every challenge must be answered. Not every enemy must be destroyed. Not every threat must be met with more strength. In the film’s final, brilliant sequence, the computer — named Joshua — runs endless simulations of thermonuclear war. Every path leads to annihilation. Every "winning move" collapses into mutual destruction. It is only when the game is refused — when the players step away — that life can continue. “The only winning move is not to play.” In that sentence lies the wisdom of the cross hidden in a Cold War thriller: The wisdom that true power is found in restraint. That true freedom is found not in conquest, but in sacrifice. That there is no victory worth winning that costs the soul its life. --- WarGames remains a deeply entertaining film: tense, fast-moving, filled with the energy of youth and the high-stakes tension of nuclear dread. It captures the spirit of an era — the fear that machines might one day outpace their makers, that humanity might perish not by malice but by its own cleverness. But it also leaves a question hanging quietly in the heart: What kind of world are we trying to build when we treat life as a game to be won? And what kind of hope might be born when, at last, we learn to lose rightly — to surrender, and so be saved? It is a question as urgent now as it was then. Maybe even more so. And for those with ears to hear, WarGames offers more than a cautionary tale. It offers a silent invitation: to set down the weapons of pride, to refuse the wars that cannot be won, and to seek, beyond the logic of conquest, the fragile, stubborn grace that still waits for those willing to lose themselves in order to live.
- Jacob O’Neal21. marts 2025I was a fan of director John Badham back in the day. Thanks to this film, Project X and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off I was a big Matthew Broderick fan as well. This movie was very interesting to me back in the day. Before we even knew what a hacker was, they showed us in this film. Granted, it was a much more primitive version of hacking. There was a great supporting cast with Ally Sheedy, Barry Corbin and Dabney Coleman. The story was both ridiculous and innovative. A kid gets on line and begins playing games with a government computer that was built to play war games. He starts the game with the computer and it begins a countdown to World War III. The good stuff was the acting and directing. This was all top notch and everything you want from an 80’s cheese fest. It delivers in spades that way. However, the story is so incredibly unbelievable that you have to sometimes struggle with disbelief. I mean, why are Broderick and Sheedy suddenly attacked by a Pterodactyl? It’s not virtual reality. I know it turns out to be remote controlled, but it was a really strange moment that comes out of nowhere. The movie has moments like that all throughout. But the issues are far less than the fun. If you surrender yourself to the movie and just suspend disbelief as best you can, you’re gonna find yourself having a lot of fun with this film. John Badham was great at making high concept, low budget movies entertaining in the 80’s. Take Short Circuit, Blue Thunder, Stakeout and Bird On A Wire (I know it’s 1990 for that one, but it was shot in 89) for example. War Games is another Badham classic. If you like 80’s movies, you’ll like War Games.
- Michael Surber12. marts 2025The first thing to remember is, this movie is from 1983. If you can accept that, this is a great movie. It is very dated but still brings a lot to the table. Good performances from some terrific actors. "Shall we play a game?"
Wargames-trivia
- juni 1983 blev Wargames udgivet.
Wargames blev instrueret af John Badham.
Wargames har en spilletid på 1 t 52 m.
Wargames blev produceret af Harold Schneider, Richard Hashimoto.
Selvom David stadig er en dreng er han noget at en troldmand, når det gælder computere. Lidt tilfældigt hacker han sig ind i Pentagon og begynder på at spille Global Thermonuclear Warfar mod computeren. Det viser sig snart at den tager spillet meget alvorligt og snart er godt i gang med at starte 3. Verdenskrig. Men kan computeren nu forstå, at Davis kun spillede for sjov?
Nøglepersonerne i Wargames er David Lightman (Matthew Broderick), McKittrick (Dabney Coleman), Stephen Falken (John Wood).
Wargames er bedømt 11.
Wargames er en Thriller, Sci-fi, Action-film.
Wargames har en publikumsbedømmelse på 7.6 ud af 10.
Wargames havde et budget på 12 mio. US$.
Wargames har indtjent 124,6 mio. US$ ved billetlugen.