TV-MA
2025    2 t 41 mAction, Drama
7.329%77%7.0
After the death of his father, warrior-king Sambhaji Maharaj battles Mughal forces led by Aurangzeb to keep the Maratha Empire alive.
Instrueret af Laxman Utekar
  • Vicky KaushalChhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj
  • Rashmika MandannaYesubai Bhonsale
  • Akshaye KhannaAurangzeb
  • Ashutosh RanaSarlashkar Hambirrao Mohite
  • Divya DuttaRajmata Soyarabai Bhosale
  • Pradeep Ram Singh RawatYesaji Kank
  • Vineet Kumar SinghChandogamatya Kavi Kalash
  • Neil BhoopalamShehzada Akbar
  • Santosh JuvekarRayaji
  • Rajiv KachrooMujtaba
  • Ashish PathodeAntaji
  • Diana PentyShehzadi Zinat-un-Nissa
  • Kiran KarmarkarAnnaji
  • Balaji ManoharMhaloji
  • Neelkantee PatekarDharau
  • Neelkantee PatekarDharau
  • Anil GeorgeMukkarab Khan
  • Sarang SathayeGanoji
  • Suvrat JoshiKanhoji
  • Ankit Anil SharmaSantaji
  • Rohan Chaughule
    Rohan Chaughule14. februar 2025
    Good movie
  • Singh Soni Singh
    Singh Soni Singh21. marts 2025
    Another Anushka Sharma I like to eat fruit
  • Abhiii
    Abhiii21. september 2025
    The history of a tremendous king who actually died for his kingdom.
  • Aryan Tripathi
    Aryan Tripathi25. april 2025
    It's not just movie... Absolut cinema
  • macaronz
    macaronz27. juli 2026
    Leave Your History Textbook at the Door ⚔️👑 Chhaava turns out to be a surprisingly gripping cinematic experience, provided you view it as a dramatic action film rather than a strict historical documentary. The movie takes undeniable creative liberties and heavily modifies real historical events for dramatic effect, which may frustrate purists. But as a pure movie experience? The direction is solid, the action scenes are high energy, and the acting is great all around. Akshaye Khanna’s transformation in particular was crazy good. Just put your brain on standby regarding the real timelines, grab some popcorn, and enjoy the show!
  • macaronz
    27. juli 2026

    Historically inspired, but far from historically accurate.

    Laxman Utekar’s Chhaava which adapts the life of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj is historically inspired, but far from historically accurate. Like most mainstream Indian historical epics (Padmaavat, Tanhaji, Bajirao Mastani), the filmmakers prioritized cinematic drama, emotional spectacle, and heroic myth-making over strict textbook facts. Here is a breakdown of where the film sticks to history versus where it takes massive creative liberties: What the Film Gets Right (Historical Grounding) * The Core Conflict: The broader political struggle between Sambhaji Maharaj (the second Maratha ruler) and Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (played by Akshaye Khanna) is accurate. Aurangzeb genuinely poured massive resources into the Deccan to crush the Marathas. * Key Relationships: Sambhaji's deep bond with his wife, Maharani Yesubai, and his fiercely loyal commander/friend, Kavi Kalash, are well-established historical facts. * The Ultimate Sacrifice: Sambhaji's refusal to surrender to Aurangzeb, his rejection of forced conversion, and his brutal execution at Tulapur are central historical realities that the film keeps intact. Where the Film Modifies History (Cinematic Liberties) In Reality: Battles in the 17th-century Deccan relied heavily on Maratha guerrilla tactics (Ganimi Kawa), terrain knowledge, hit-and-run ambushes, and siege warfare. In the Film: Sambhaji is portrayed as a near-superhuman, one-man-army hero engaged in stylized, continuous hand-to-hand combat. These heroic physical massacres are modern Bollywood action tropes designed to get cheers, not historical realities. Timeline Compression & Simplified Politics In Reality: The Maratha-Mughal conflict was a complex, decade-long political game involving multiple factions (the Siddis, the Portuguese, internal Maratha rivalries, and internal Mughal rebellions). In the Film: To keep the runtime moving and narrative easy to digest, multi-year political maneuvers and diplomacy are condensed into quick, direct personal rivalries. Villains and Dialogue Style In Reality: Historical records (both Maratha and contemporary Mughal court records like Ma'asir-i-Alamgiri) show political calculations on both sides were tactical and cold. In the Film: Court conversations, villain dialogue, and confrontations are given heavy, theatrical Bollywood punchlines to maximize emotional hero-versus-villain tension. The Verdict Your instinct in your review was spot on: if you treat Chhaava as a strict history lesson, you'll spot countless inaccuracies, dramatizations, and timeline shifts. But as a heroic cinematic tribute and action blockbuster, it accomplishes exactly what it set out to do.
  • macaronz
    27. juli 2026

    Historically inspired, but far from historically accurate.

    Laxman Utekar’s Chhaava which adapts the life of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj is historically inspired, but far from historically accurate. Like most mainstream Indian historical epics (Padmaavat, Tanhaji, Bajirao Mastani), the filmmakers prioritized cinematic drama, emotional spectacle, and heroic myth-making over strict textbook facts. Here is a breakdown of where the film sticks to history versus where it takes massive creative liberties: What the Film Gets Right (Historical Grounding) * The Core Conflict: The broader political struggle between Sambhaji Maharaj (the second Maratha ruler) and Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (played by Akshaye Khanna) is accurate. Aurangzeb genuinely poured massive resources into the Deccan to crush the Marathas. * Key Relationships: Sambhaji's deep bond with his wife, Maharani Yesubai, and his fiercely loyal commander/friend, Kavi Kalash, are well-established historical facts. * The Ultimate Sacrifice: Sambhaji's refusal to surrender to Aurangzeb, his rejection of forced conversion, and his brutal execution at Tulapur are central historical realities that the film keeps intact. Where the Film Modifies History (Cinematic Liberties) In Reality: Battles in the 17th-century Deccan relied heavily on Maratha guerrilla tactics (Ganimi Kawa), terrain knowledge, hit-and-run ambushes, and siege warfare. In the Film: Sambhaji is portrayed as a near-superhuman, one-man-army hero engaged in stylized, continuous hand-to-hand combat. These heroic physical massacres are modern Bollywood action tropes designed to get cheers, not historical realities. Timeline Compression & Simplified Politics In Reality: The Maratha-Mughal conflict was a complex, decade-long political game involving multiple factions (the Siddis, the Portuguese, internal Maratha rivalries, and internal Mughal rebellions). In the Film: To keep the runtime moving and narrative easy to digest, multi-year political maneuvers and diplomacy are condensed into quick, direct personal rivalries. Villains and Dialogue Style In Reality: Historical records (both Maratha and contemporary Mughal court records like Ma'asir-i-Alamgiri) show political calculations on both sides were tactical and cold. In the Film: Court conversations, villain dialogue, and confrontations are given heavy, theatrical Bollywood punchlines to maximize emotional hero-versus-villain tension. The Verdict Your instinct in your review was spot on: if you treat Chhaava as a strict history lesson, you'll spot countless inaccuracies, dramatizations, and timeline shifts. But as a heroic cinematic tribute and action blockbuster, it accomplishes exactly what it set out to do.
  • ranbirgamerz
    29. juni 2026

    How to see

    How to see this movie

Få Plex på dine enheder

Gratis på 20+ platforme. Vælg din egen.
Se alle understøttede enheder →

Chhaava-trivia