1980年代中期的冷战时期，英国谢菲尔德市的居民鲁思·贝克特和吉米·坎普正在为即将到来的婚姻和第一个孩子的出生做准备，谢菲尔德是皇家空军基地的所在地，拥有主要的钢铁、能源和化工生产基地。但是苏联向伊朗进军，计划将其转变为苏联的卫星国。美国、英国以及北约和联合国的其他成员 愤怒地谴责苏联的侵略和军事活动，尤其是在附近的R.A.F.基地，露丝和吉米的家人忙于他们的日常事务，很少关注伊朗发生的事情，一个春日，没有任何警告，苏联用ICBMs袭击了英国——其中两个袭击了谢菲尔德，摧毁了大部分建筑和居民，但更可怕的是随之而来的后果——一个没有公共秩序的世界，没有干净的食物、水、电，也没有能力生产其中任何一种。露丝挣扎了10多年才在这个可怕的，贫瘠的，放射性的国土上生存……
- Garrett Wilkins4天前I don't often venture outside my usual focus on modern independent and arthouse cinema, but Threads had developed a reputation that made it difficult to ignore. It's one of those older films people speak about less for its craftsmanship than for the psychological mark it leaves on those who watch it. Considering it was produced on what would amount to only about half a million dollars today, while its better-known American counterpart, The Day After, reportedly cost around $7 million, I was curious to see whether its reputation had been exaggerated. It wasn't. Rather than sensationalizing its premise, Mick Jackson leans fully into the film's docudrama approach, creating an experience that feels less like watching a movie than witnessing a plausible chain of events unfold. The film never depends on spectacle to unsettle its audience, proving that atmosphere and conviction can accomplish far more than a large budget ever could. What impressed me most was how completely the film commits to its premise. Rather than searching for easy moments of hope or conventional dramatic release, it remains focused on portraying the consequences of catastrophe with an honesty that's difficult to shake. My threshold for films that are supposed to leave a lasting psychological impact is admittedly quite high, so I wasn't expecting Threads to affect me as much as it did. The film's closing image ultimately became the strongest expression of everything that came before it. Threads may fall well outside the kind of cinema I usually seek out, but it's exactly the sort of film that reminds me why some older classics continue to earn their reputation decades later.
- stuhannaford2025年7月16日Plays more like a public service announcement nowadays, but I can imagine the genuine fear and sheer terror watching this would likely have caused viewers during the Cold War. As the film progresses, it descends into a collection of individual scenes, more than an overarching story as a whole. There are two aspects to consider, the effect of nuclear war, physically, and the effects socially. From a physical point of view, and with a terrifying accuracy on real life events, I’d recommend Chernobyl, the HBO series, documenting the disaster at the infamous plant, over Threads. It simply doesn’t hold back. A movie from a fictional standpoint, you’ll do worse than 28 Days Later and the apocalypse that shows. Sadly, and rather prophetically, the film’s lasting message is that of government overreach, the rise of authoritarian regimes in the name of the good of the people and the disintegration of society as we know it. Every man and woman for themselves. To see this for your own eyes, recent events from the turn of the 2020’s paint a similar picture in reality, one might argue.
- MrMitchie2025年3月16日Wow, so this film was recommended to me to watch because the reviewer basically said in a nutshell "This will be one of the most disturbing movies you will ever watch". I have finally watched this film and my high expectations coming into it were not disappointed. This film is brutal, direct & gritty it is a look at what could be if a nuclear war was to happen.
火线花絮
火线于1984年9月23日发布。
火线由Mick Jackson执导。
火线的时长为1小时 57分钟。
火线由Mick Jackson制作。
1980年代中期的冷战时期，英国谢菲尔德市的居民鲁思·贝克特和吉米·坎普正在为即将到来的婚姻和第一个孩子的出生做准备，谢菲尔德是皇家空军基地的所在地，拥有主要的钢铁、能源和化工生产基地。但是苏联向伊朗进军，计划将其转变为苏联的卫星国。美国、英国以及北约和联合国的其他成员 愤怒地谴责苏联的侵略和军事活动，尤其是在附近的R.A.F.基地，露丝和吉米的家人忙于他们的日常事务，很少关注伊朗发生的事情，一个春日，没有任何警告，苏联用ICBMs袭击了英国——其中两个袭击了谢菲尔德，摧毁了大部分建筑和居民，但更可怕的是随之而来的后果——一个没有公共秩序的世界，没有干净的食物、水、电，也没有能力生产其中任何一种。露丝挣扎了10多年才在这个可怕的，贫瘠的，放射性的国土上生存……
火线中的关键角色有Ruth Beckett（Karen Meagher）, Jimmy Kemp（Reece Dinsdale）, Mr. Kemp（David Brierly）。
火线的评级为NC-17。
火线是一部剧情, 战争, 科幻电影。
火线的观众评分为9.2（满分10分）。
火线的预算曾是US$42万。