スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミー
4.585%52%5.3
A young group of cadets come together to pursue a common dream of hope and optimism. Under the watchful and demanding eyes of their instructors, they will discover what it takes to become Starfleet officers as they navigate blossoming friendships, explosive rivalries, first loves and a new enemy that threatens both the Academy and the Federation itself.
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーの評価とレビュー
- zere142026年1月20日Best part was the video buffering
- Arthas Menethil2026年1月16日WTF, this is not Star Trek. Watching an action fugure of Spock sitting in a chair is more entertaining. Somebody please fire Kurtzman.
- plexolog1st2026年4月17日Dang! I thought this show was cool and had high hopes, but woke agenda strikes again.
- Fruit jelly2026年4月3日Beautiful Jewish couple
- Bmanor2026年4月3日HONESTLY not a bad show showing the integration of different species from other worlds and some good battle scenes however a couple of things Do all intergalactic beings copulate the same way as human earthlings do and are their organs in the same spot [yes there is a very mild sex scene] Does Star Fleet have a guide to the array of different vessels in fleet
- John F. Doran2026年3月22日I’m glad I ignored the flood of zero-rating reviews and watched this for myself. I’ve been an avid Star Trek fan since seeing The Original Series during its first run as a kid, and if there’s one thing I’ve learned over the years, it’s that Star Trek has always been hit-or-miss. The Motion Picture fell flat for me, while The Wrath of Khan was incredible. Deep Space Nine didn’t resonate, but Voyager is something I still revisit every year. I loved Picard and had mostly positive impressions of Discovery. Star Trek: Starfleet Academy is a different kind of entry, and I genuinely enjoyed it for what it is. It tries something new, which has always been part of what Star Trek is about. For those purists tearing it apart, I think that misses the bigger picture. Gene Roddenberry’s vision of the future was rooted in progress—and progress inherently involves change. Expecting every new installment to mirror the past overlooks that core idea.
- Patrick2026年1月16日Edit* I'm dropping my rating down as this has not kept the excitement and pace of the first episode. I hope the characters can be fleshed out and show their strengths. I guess there has always been a thought that all Starfleet officers are the best of, types of people. This works. Actually liking the parallels with the current political climate and the hope for a better future. I imagine it brings back the nostalgia of what star trek is supposed to represent.
- Davorin Cawood2026年3月20日0 Stars!!!! this is the worst Star Trek series of all time!! absolute poo poo, do not reccommend at all!! it is a waste of time.
- Queensland Famdamily2026年1月18日About as boring as Discovery. Not your father's Star Trek.
- Mike_Thor2026年1月17日Deep Space 90210 I'm on the fence and wondering where they're going to take this. EDIT: I added a half star to this review. If there is more writing like episode 5 I'll only increase my rating. If you only watch one episode of this series let it be episode 5.
- gooserex2026年3月17日Woke slope, poorly written, and 'science' that is laughable at best.
- parralox2026年1月28日Will people be watching this in 30 years? I’m no Betazoid but I can guess the answer 😂. I’ll watch Deep Space Nine now (THAT’S some great writing and acting ❤️)
- Junior Reyes2026年3月15日What a frustration. The intention to be inclusive feels less like a box checked on a marketing checklist and more like a poorly told story—and for a lifelong *Star Trek* fan, that is a bitter pill to swallow. I have prepared a review that condenses all the key issues of this season—the vulgarity, the lack of discipline, the technological inconsistencies, and the superficial character development—while maintaining a firm, critical tone, and carefully choosing my language to avoid censorship. *Star Trek: Starfleet Academy* – An Absolute Disappointment. As a follower of the franchise, watching *Starfleet Academy* has been less of a pleasure and more of an ordeal. Although it is marketed as a necessary evolution, the reality is that we are dealing with a product that embodies the worst aspects of modern "woke" content: cheap, hollow posturing that utterly destroys the essence of what Gene Roddenberry created. 1. The Normalization of Vulgarity: Ever since the Abrams films, an unnecessary vulgarity has infiltrated the franchise. In *The Next Generation*, they didn't need profanity to captivate us; they presented us with an advanced, respectful society. Here, the dialogue feels forced and lacks the wit and grace of a well-written script. 2. Lack of Discipline and Respect for Rank: It is unacceptable to see Dean Nala (Holly Hunter) sitting on the bridge with her feet propped up on the chair, or reading a book as if she were relaxing in her own living room. If those in authority do not respect their rank or demonstrate discipline, how are they supposed to train the cadets? Michael Burnham—for all the criticism she received—at least respected the bridge. 3. Technological Inconsistencies and "Inclusive Posturing": Setting a series a thousand years in the future, only to feature a cadet in a manual wheelchair or another wearing prescription glasses, is ridiculous—and even condescending. In a society equipped with programmable matter and advanced medical technology, this isn't inclusion; it’s a complete lack of imagination. We have certainly had characters with disabilities before—such as Geordi La Forge or the blind alien in *Strange New Worlds*—but their limitations were addressed through futuristic technology or heightened senses, not with elements borrowed from the 20th century. 4. The Ruination of Klingon Culture: The handling of Jiden Crack is lamentable. They aim to explore his identity, yet they do so in a purely superficial manner. Presenting a Klingon warrior—one who supposedly has not renounced his culture—wearing a female-style uniform skirt solely because he is gay, and without any underlying cultural rationale, is nothing more than hollow posturing. They get bogged down in the "parents vs. children" conflict we have seen a thousand times over, rather than genuinely developing the lore of his species. 5. Unnecessary Militarization: The introduction of a "military academy" distinct from Starfleet itself contradicts the exploratory spirit that defines the franchise. The entire production feels like a generic American teen drama—mimicking shows like *Sex Education*, but without any of their quality or depth. My opinion: If you want to see diversity done right, watch *The Orville* or even the classic *Star Trek* series. *Starfleet Academy* is a hollow showcase that merely uses the *Star Trek* brand name to attract an audience, while showing no respect for the franchise's legacy. It is mediocre trash that I would not recommend to anyone. If a second season were to materialize—and I even heard that they are supposedly planning a third—I hope they manage to rectify all these flaws. This franchise holds the potential for a great story, yet its execution leaves nothing but a bad memory; either they reinvent themselves, or they will finish burying what little audience they have left.
- Colonel Ron Aronoff - U.S.A.R.2026年3月15日CANCELLED - Sponge Bob beats in viewers, 27-year-old cartoon. Mr. Krabs would you buy advertisement on Starfleet Academy? "That's me money you want, burning it would at least give us heat." Plankton's 'Chum Bucket' has more patrons than this Star Trek: Starshit Academy has viewers. 0 stars would have said it all. Kurtzman made Chris Pine expunge his insides from this inebriated written show. It definitely is NOT imbued with the hand of Roddenberry. I love what Giamatti said: 'you can only do so much with the material they handed me.' Says it all. Paramount had Kathleen Kenedy as a consultant on loan from Disney. Only someone of an enervated intellect can enjoy this Imagine these individuals graduating to become ensigns (0-1)? Then being promoted through the ranks as military low to mid-level officers (0-2,0-3, etc.)? "Klingons on the starboard bow!! It's Khan" [say in a high-pitched voice] "H-e-l-p, H-E-L-P !! Oh no we weren't trained for this. We were too busy doing everything but learning how to actually defend our fleet and be trained in the use of weapons. Raise the white flag; we give up. H-E-L-P!' "Lower it, we'll just transmit these episodes and they'll hypper jump to 5 different alternative universes toget away." McCoy "Jim, there is no testosterone here, in fact estrogen is not here either. Only a overweight blob of a hologram who just killed her career, a bunch of weenies, duds and Giamattti, trying, ever so trying to make fecal soup edible" Jim "Scotty beam me anywhere away from this inept and maladroit crew."
- williamw8342026年3月14日This show had its ups and downs, but at its core it’s TREK. I loved this show and season two has me excited for what’s next. Everyone hating on it is old and boring, this show was amazing and i recommend that every Trekkie should watch it.
- acwarr22026年2月5日There is a Klingon in a skirt the whole episode.
- necklesswonder2026年1月29日No way this wasn't written in 8 minutes on half a roll of toilet paper. The series and concept, not just an episode.
- Walter Jospeh Kovacs2026年1月23日Richard Picardo posted a reference to how Voyager was criticised for being too woke ("politically correct") back in the day and a lot of people were vocal about a female captain. Now this series is criticised for wokeness such as the interspecies lesbian relationship. I can't help but think this is a good sign of Star Trek pushing boundaries to question societal norms. If someone is uncomfortable with diversity/inclusivity, I can't help but wonder if they've missed the point of Star Trek completely! We're following Starfleet and the Federation which unites a diverse range of species and doesn't measure their value in some simple-minded linear transactional aspect of capitalism but instead produces a common ground through which all individuals and species and societies can prosper. However, this is not Star Trek as I grew up to admire and respect. This doesn't cause me to contemplate philosophical ideas. I don't even find myself intrigued by the science-fiction. I think it is a recruitment drive for a younger audience. And while that is positive, I suspect that younger audience is either very superficially-minded or the script-writers perceive them to be. This series feels empty and I know it's fiction, but totally implausible. There's no way you'd empower that lay-about Captain with such responsibility. Disappointed but unsurprising.
- Chris Val2026年3月14日They literally screw the Star Trek last 2 Movies after Picard. Who is the autor of this movie. Sorry but junkie will make a better and more interesting script. This season's movie pointing stories without any idea or soooo dumb stories, sorry, but after Picard it is a disaster. The only thing they are pushing in viewers' eyes is the WOKE agenda and all "gender neutrality" stuff! This particular Academy is full of crap! common really!
- AbsolutelyNot03042026年3月13日great show. we were not disappointed.
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーに関するトリビア
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーは、全1シーズンです。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーは、全10話です。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーの主要人物はNahla Ake (Holly Hunter), Caleb Mir (Sandro Rosta), Jay-Den Kraag (Karim Diane)です。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーはAlex Kurtzman, Andi Armaganian, Douglas Aarniokoski, Larry Teng, Jonathan Frakes, Olatunde Osunsanmiが監督を務めました。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーはNorman Denver, Dana N. Wilsonがプロデューサーを務めました。
A young group of cadets come together to pursue a common dream of hope and optimism. Under the watchful and demanding eyes of their instructors, they will discover what it takes to become Starfleet officers as they navigate blossoming friendships, explosive rivalries, first loves and a new enemy that threatens both the Academy and the Federation itself.
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーはTV-14と評価されています。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーは、サイエンスフィクション, Action, Adventureの番組です。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーは、視聴者によって10点満点中5.2点をつけられています。
スター・トレック：スターフリート・アカデミーの話の長さは、62mです。
スタジオからの新しいシーズンに関する情報はまだありません。