Uma missão de vigilância das forças especiais da Marinha dos EUA resulta numa emboscada em território inimigo no Iraque.
- rg9400há 1 diaI went into Warfare with very high expectations considering the extremely talented cast of upcoming actors and the fact that it was written (in part) by Alex Garland. War movies tend to not move the needle very much for me, and I've started to feel that a lot of them are sanitized in their political context. With this type of talent for a movie set during the Iraq war, I was expecting a lot more thematic nuance that felt more than just a standard American propaganda movie. Make no mistake, Warfare is well-made. The sound design is excellent, and despite its opening act being a bit slow, it definitely builds tension effectively. There is a lot of military jargon thrown around, and the chaos of the singular event is palpable. The problem is that the movie doesn't do much beyond that. The characters are just various representations of shell-shock, and outside of their fight to survival, they aren't noteworthy at all. I sometimes struggled to differentiate some of the characters outside of some slight behavioral quirks. The movie frustratingly does not even elaborate on why the characters get stuck in this situation, and it glosses over any sort of reckoning with what is actually happening. There are moments where I thought the movie was somewhat self-aware of how certain people were treated during this event, but it barely spends a passing glance on them. There is no attempt at tackling some of the more difficult questions at the center of this movie, and it really is only about its title, Warfare. It is a sanitized, binary view of the conflict with very little thematic, character, or plot depth. This is standard for war movies, but I was expecting a lot more considering the people and studio behind the movie. If you just want a tense depiction of the fighting in war, it's an okay watch. If you want anything even remotely more, you'll be sorely disappointed.
- Omer Naor16 de maio de 2026Think I got ptsd during the movie. Realistically to the bone. The whole idea that the entire movie is about one encounter that have very low significance to the entire battle is so absurdly accurate. No huge drama, no last lines, no pathos and yet very overwhelmingly hard. The confusion is real.
- COCO14 de março de 2025One of the most intense movies I’ve watched all year. A visceral 90-minute war drama that drops you behind enemy lines in the middle of the gory action. The silence throughout the first 15-minutes alone is enough to build up some dramatic tension that kept me at the edge of my seat throughout. It’s incredibly immersive and raw with its approach. There’s no score but the sound design is absolutely insane, watch it in the loudest theater possible.
- Chris C11 de abril de 2025Intense. Visceral. Unflinching. All the adjectives you've heard about this film are true. Far from your typical Hollywood "recruitment" war film, 'Warfare' is a sobering, heart-pounding look at the effects of modern, well, warfare. The first act is almost eerily quiet, serving as a stark counterpoint to the chaotic battle set to begin. Once it starts, though, there is no pause in what unfolds in the largely real-time depiction. Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland have created a truly incredible movie based on the memories of the soldiers who were present for this battle. This film deserves to be seen on the biggest screen—and loudest theater—you can find.
- zachkuh7 de maio de 2026most raw , real , visceral , intense movie i have ever seen in my life. after the movie finished , i was stuck in a state of pure silence for about 10 minutes. & then - i threw up. this has never happened to me before in my entire life. my marine corps veteran husband and i watched this together tonight , and although we have both seen every war/military/etc movie there is … nothing has ever affected me the way this has. 10/10. no words. thank you to all who keep us safe.
- RipLinesMan20 de abril de 2025Warfare and Event Horizon (1997) both begin with missions — controlled, tactical, professional — and end with men undone by the environments that devour them. One is grounded in the chaos of 2006 Ramadi, the other drifts in the black void of space. But both ask the same question: what happens when the mission becomes survival, and survival isn’t guaranteed? Warfare unfolds in real time, as a Navy SEAL team takes over a building and finds themselves pinned down and cut off. Will Poulter brings raw tension as Erik, the Officer in Charge losing grip by the minute. Joseph Quinn gives Sam a layered weariness, quietly powerful in the film’s most harrowing moments. Cosmo Jarvis as Elliott Miller is visceral and vulnerable — the kind of performance that says everything with almost no dialogue. Charles Melton, Michael Gandolfini, and Finn Bennett add weight and realism to a cast that feels as battered and bruised as the setting demands. In Event Horizon, Laurence Fishburne’s Captain Miller is a man built for order — a leader who watches his training dissolve into fear. Sam Neill’s Dr. Weir descends into madness with elegance, becoming something more dangerous than the ship itself. Kathleen Quinlan’s Peters, Jason Isaacs’ D.J., and Richard T. Jones’ Cooper each face their own reckoning as reality fractures around them. It’s not the void that breaks them — it’s what they brought with them. Both films hinge on the collapse of structure. Orders become pleas. Extraction becomes fantasy. And what remains is silence, injury, and the unsettling knowledge that not everyone who lives gets out clean. Warfare ends with a dust-covered retreat. Event Horizon ends in psychological ruin. But both leave the same imprint: something happened to these men that no report could ever explain.
- Mikey Smith5 de maio de 2025The craziest, purest, and most raw war movie I’ve ever seen. No big story, no main character just a bunch of dudes fighting together to stay alive. I really loved this approach. It took the Hollywood emotional and cliche war movie tropes and threw them out the window. It’s all about the soldiers in that building for an hour and a half. The sound design, set design, and wardrobe was all outstanding. It all felt lived in and authentic. The acting was phenomenal. Nothing too flashy, just I don’t know, it felt real! Also almost sh*t my pants when that IED went off. Great film. 4/5.
- brian.ho9322 de fevereiro de 2026People say it's the most accurate depiction of war, but I disagree. It's an accurate depiction of a battle, but there are many films with a lot more to say about war. Not a big Alex Garland fan and this didn't change my mind. Better suited as a short film, but there's no market for that.
- royalcopter10 de fevereiro de 2026I get that it's an account of something real. But there is no plot or point or context. It feels like you're watching a really long scene in a movie and missing 95% of the rest of the movie. Like you walked in to the theater missing the beginning because you were late and passed out before the end.
Obtenha Plex em Seus Dispositivos
Gratuito em mais de 20 plataformas. Escolha o seu.Trívia de Warfare
Warfarefoi lançado em 10 de abril de 2025.
Warfarefoi dirigido por Ray Mendoza, Alex Garland.
Warfaretem a duração de 1 h 35 min.
Warfarefoi produzido por Peter Rice, Andrew Macdonald, Allon Reich, Matthew Penry-Davey.
Uma missão de vigilância das forças especiais da Marinha dos EUA resulta numa emboscada em território inimigo no Iraque.
Os caracteres-chave em Warfare são Ray (D'Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai), Erik (Will Poulter), Elliott (Cosmo Jarvis).
Warfare é avaliado R.
Warfare é um filme de Guerra, Action, Drama.
Warfare tem uma classificação de audiência 9.2de 10.
Warfare teve um orçamento de US$ 20 mi.
Warfare fez US$ 34,9 mi na bilheteria.