PG
2018    1 h 31 minAnimação, Ficção científica
5.160%28%6.5
Com a aliança da Terra enfraquecida, Haruo pondera aliar-se aos Exif, cujo culto da morte está a invocar um monstro capaz de destruir o mundo.
Dirigido por Hiroyuki Seshita, Kobun Shizuno

Onde assistir Godzilla Parte 3 - O Devorador de Planetas

  • Mamoru MiyanoHaruo Sakaki (voice)
  • Takahiro SakuraiMetphies (voice)
  • Kana HanazawaYuko Tani (voice)
  • Tomokazu SugitaMartin Lazzari (voice)
  • Yuki KajiAdam Bindewald (voice)
  • Reina UedaMaina (voice)
  • Ari OzawaMiana (voice)
  • Daisuke OnoEliott Leland (voice)
  • Kenyu HoriuchiUnberto Mori (voice)
  • Kazuya NakaiHalu-elu Dolu-do (voice)
  • Kazuhiro YamajiEndurph (voice)
  • Saori HayamiHaruka Sakaki (voice)
  • Kenichi SuzumuraAkira Sakaki (voice)
  • Kanehira YamamotoTakeshi J. Hamamoto (voice)
  • Hiroyuki SeshitaRealizador
  • Kobun ShizunoRealizador
  • Gen UrobuchiArgumento
  • Keiji OtaProdutor Executivo
  • Yoshihiro FurusawaProdutor Executivo
  • Takashi YoshizawaProdutor
  • Shaydeknight17 de janeiro de 2026
    This was just patently depressing and boring. Godzilla: The Planet Eater is not a monster movie in the conventional sense. It is a philosophical capstone to an already bleak trilogy, and it is far more interested in ideas than in spectacle. Anyone expecting a triumphant showdown or a cathartic resolution will likely find it frustrating. That frustration is not accidental. It is the point. The film frames Godzilla less as a creature and more as a fact of existence. The real conflict is not about defeating a monster, but about how humanity defines meaning when faced with something fundamentally overwhelming. Faith, despair, hatred, resignation, and responsibility are the true battlegrounds here, and the monsters function more as symbols than as antagonists. Where the film becomes divisive is in its moral stance. It leans heavily toward a world view that prizes restraint, acceptance, and the rejection of absolute solutions. Power pursued without limits is treated as inherently corrupting, no matter how justified the goal. The movie asks whether survival alone is enough, or whether the desire to shape and challenge one's environment is inseparable from being human. Whether that reads as humility or capitulation depends entirely on the values you bring into the viewing. I think the film ultimately confuses surrender with wisdom. It presents withdrawal as maturity and diminished ambition as moral clarity, but never demonstrates that this leads to balance or dignity. The outcome it gestures toward is not equilibrium but regression: humanity endures, but only by shrinking itself, abandoning agency, and accepting a permanent position at the bottom of a hostile hierarchy. Survival is preserved, but purpose is quietly stripped away. For a story that interrogates the cost of absolute power, it shows little interest in the cost of permanent submission. Visually and tonally, The Planet Eater is austere and cold. Dialogue is sparse and deliberate. Silence is used as a weapon. The pacing demands patience and rewards attention, but it will feel punishing if you are not in sync with its intent. This is not a film that wants to entertain you so much as confront you. Ultimately, The Planet Eater is less interested in Godzilla than in humanity's relationship with power, faith, and progress. It does not offer comfort, and it does not pretend to resolve its own contradictions. Instead, it leaves you with an uncomfortable question: if the only way to survive is to abandon agency, ambition, and the drive to shape the world, is that survival still meaningfully human? Whether you see the film as thoughtful or misguided will say more about you than about Godzilla. And I still wanted more monster fights, and honestly, the Godzilla design of this film was as boring as hell.

Obtenha Plex em Seus Dispositivos

Gratuito em mais de 20 plataformas. Escolha o seu.
Veja todos os dispositivos suportados →

Trívia de Godzilla Parte 3 - O Devorador de Planetas