Not Rated
2021    2小时恐怖, 惊悚
5.339%23%5.7
阿曼达·塞弗里德商谈主演Netflix超自然题材惊悚片《所见所闻》(Things Heard & Seen),莎里·斯宾厄·伯曼&罗伯特·帕西尼(《保姆日记》《万圣年代》)自编自导。   改编自Elizabeth Brundage所著书籍《All Things Cease to Appear》,风格类似《鬼入侵》,故事围绕着一对年轻夫妇展开,他们搬到纽约北部一个小镇附近的农场居住,而这个新家被前主人的谋杀罪所诅咒,随着闹鬼的秘密被揭露,他们的婚姻也暴露出黑暗面。
Robert Pulcini, Shari Springer Berman执导
  • Amanda SeyfriedCatherine Claire
  • James NortonGeorge Claire
  • Natalia DyerWillis
  • Alex NeustaedterEddie Vayle
  • Rhea SeehornJustine
  • Michael O'KeefeTravis Laughton
  • Karen AllenMare Laughton
  • Jack GoreCole Vayle
  • F. Murray AbrahamFloyd DeBeers
  • James UrbaniakBram
  • Ana Sophia HegerFranny Claire
  • Charlotte MaierPeg
  • Kristin GriffithAudrey Claire
  • Ben GraneyHusband #2
  • Molly JobeWife #1
  • Joey AuzenneHusband #1
  • Kelcy GriffinLynne
  • Cotter SmithTom Claire
  • Dan DailyPat
  • Maureen YoungBlind Woman
  • KyGun2026年4月20日
    Not for me. Slow and stupid. Its always the man's fault. For once I'd like to see this girl Amanda Seyfried play in something where she's not the abused female. Seems like that's all she's been in lately. The whole ghostly aspect was not well done at all. Guess she needed the money.
  • jackmeat2025年9月14日
    My quick rating - 5.2/10. Time to let shuffle decide, I only picked the horror genre. I saw the Netflix logo, but I have no idea if it is still playing on there. Oh, and a best-selling book as well. I have to assume that the book was far better than this was. Especially the ending, which massively detracted from a decent slow-burn ghost story they were concocting. Which is part of the issue here. I have no idea why they even bothered trying to make it a ghost story. It never gets fully explored, and the characters' issues with one another throughout were doing just fine without the low-quality effects specters occasionally seen. They didn't look any better than a TV movie from 30 years ago. We have a woman (Amanda Seyfried) who relocates with her hubbie (James Norton) for work reasons but begins to think there are some dark issues going on in their marriage. Seyfried is actually quite good in her role here, while Norton I thought the exact opposite. Now, this is where it gets muddled since they could've stuck with that and delivered on the acting and story. But then they mixed in the history of the house. Now I am always up for a good haunting, so I was game, except they never used it to the potential it had. An occasional description from a neighbor or something in a picture that correlates to an old story. Things like this are sprinkled in and then forgotten. She is a bolemiac? Naw, forget that having any significance. Affairs? Just quick eye candy, no development on that. Just a lot of lazy screenwriting. There are some subtle hints to a deeper haunting that I may have picked out, like the cross in the photo or the slideshow error in class. Not really spoilers, more something to watch for, since I am not sure if that has anything to do with the plot as a whole. But I am willing to bet these clues made more sense in the story that was told in the book. Maybe with this complete letdown of an ending, those hints were just unused material like those few things I just mentioned. But it looks nice for the scenery, as expected on a Netflix budget, it just doesn't deliver much more than an average story with an ending that is like a massive gut punch.

观看所见所闻视频

  • Things Heard & Seen
    Things Heard & Seen预告片

在您的设备上获取Plex

在20多个平台上免费使用。选择您的平台。
查看所有支持的设备 →

所见所闻花絮