キートン将軍

監督:Clyde Bruckman, Buster Keaton
G
1926    74mAction, Adventure
8.192%92%7.9
After being rejected by the Confederate military, not realizing it was due to his crucial civilian role, an engineer must single-handedly recapture his beloved locomotive after it is seized by Union spies and return it through enemy lines.
  • Buster KeatonJohnnie Gray / 監督 / 脚本 / プロデューサー / 編集者
  • Marion MackAnnabelle Lee
  • Glen CavenderCaptain Anderson
  • Jim FarleyGeneral Thatcher
  • Frederick VroomA Southern General
  • Frank BarnesAnnabelle's Brother
  • Charles Henry SmithAnnabelle's Father / Adaptation
  • Joe KeatonUnion General
  • Mike DonlinUnion General
  • Tom NawnUnion General
  • Henry BairdSoldier (uncredited)
  • Joe BricherSoldier (uncredited)
  • Jimmy BryantRaider (uncredited)
  • Sergeant BukowskiOfficer (uncredited)
  • C.C. CrusonOfficer (uncredited)
  • Jack DempsterRaider (uncredited)
  • Keith FennellSoldier (uncredited)
  • Budd FineRaider (uncredited)
  • Eddie FosterUnion Railroad Fireman (uncredited)
  • Ronald GilstrapUnion Soldier (uncredited)
  • Pyutaros2026年2月1日
    Watching The General 100 years later, you realize that Buster Keaton wasn’t just a comedian—he was the original Tom Cruise. The level of physical commitment here is staggering. There are no green screens or safety wires; just a man, a moving train, and a willingness to actually set fire to a bridge and crash a $42,000 locomotive into a river for the sake of the shot. ​What really stood out to me though, was the character of Annabelle Lee (Marion Mack). While she’s often framed as the "damsel," she’s a total boss from the jump. She’s the one who shames Johnnie into the war, effectively "cuckolding" his pride until he can earn back his status with a uniform. And when she finally gets on that train, she doesn't wait to be rescued—she climbs on like she owns the place and starts operating the engine herself. She’s essentially a 1920s proto-Ripley. ​The film also has this fascinating, almost "exploitation" grit. Keaton flips history on its head, making the Confederacy the scrappy underdogs just to make the "David vs. Goliath" stunts work better. It’s an apolitical, purely visceral approach to filmmaking that prioritizes the spectacle of the stunt over the logic of the era. ​The ending is pure "Keaton Logic"—an adorable, mechanical sequence where he has to solve the engineering problem of how to salute the army and kiss his girl at the same time. A masterpiece of action-geometry that still feels more modern than most CGI blockbusters today.
  • theLillyPad2025年2月17日
    Buster Keaton was the Tom Cruise of his era. No, I'm serious. What this man pulled off for his stunts both stuns and amazes. Nowhere is this better showcased than the General, where we see him pull off every fantastic feat one could imagine with a train (and many you couldn't!) I highly recommend watching a little documentary on his life on youtube or something and then jumping in both feet first into this or Sherlock Jr. Otherwise, Keaton makes his stunts look so natural you might just miss how dangerous they really are!
  • Max_72026年1月29日
    Top movie. Great actors
  • Elliot0472025年12月30日
    Super funny. Even without dialogues. Love it.
  • Jackson2025年9月18日
    This is my first Buster Keaton movie, and I am very impressed with his stunt work. However I had to watch the movie twice to really grasp it, and for being a silent film, it shouldn't have required that. Knowing it has one of the most expensive scenes in silent-film history, I was not impressed by it at all. However it was a silly and moderately entertaining movie, the ending disappointed however.
  • simonb1112025年12月5日
    Great film
  • shreyasray2025年7月13日
    Firstly, the Confederate propaganda is painfully evident and jarring personally. The technical aspects of the film are well done particularly given the limitations of the time. The train chase sequences are ingenious from an action perspective and well-choreographed. The plot, however, feels relatively bare-bones and becomes repetitive quickly. The two extended train sequences become repetitive after a while and contribute nothing to the story. Overall, a decent enough film, may be worth a watch just to experience the really impressive choreography and stuntwork.
  • Thomas Keith2025年6月18日
    Why are colorized version of a classic silent movie., ?
  • Tyler S2025年3月17日
    👍👍 8/10
  • Rowan Krzysiak2025年1月6日
    I was all about ready to lay into Buster Keaton having seen two pretty shitty movies held aloft as classics and then I watched 'The General' and it helped reframe him a little for me. I naturally and perhaps unfairly drew comparisons against Chaplin to which Keaton has no chance of matching. Too often it seems he has the 'Family Guy' disease of just shoving in a joke or set-piece abruptly without it really serving much purpose toward the wider context at which Chaplin was the king. However, where these jokes also fall flat, the set-pieces and trickery are often startling and impressive. The stunts are also so raw that the treachery is real. So as for 'The General' well...here the set-piece essentially is the wider conext. It's not far off an hour long train-chase with every stunt and situation possible thrown at it. It remains entertaining throughout with a couple of moments that actually had me gasping. He's not particularly a storyteller or a clown and his screen presence is weak. It is as a human prop, driving the on-screen action where he is most successful and as a wholly action-packed and punchy movie I recommend this one. I am however also unlikely to watch another Keaton movie.

キートン将軍を視聴

  • The General
    The General予告編

キートン将軍に関するトリビア

お使いのデバイス向けのPlexを入手

20種類以上のプラットフォームで無料で使えます。お手持ちのデバイスをお選びください。
すべてのサポート済みデバイスを見る →