0:000:00
When a 15th-century prince denounces God after the loss of his wife he inherits an eternal curse: he becomes Dracula. Condemned to wander the centuries, he defies fate and death, guided by a single hope - to be reunited with his lost love.
- Darren Webster2025年9月18日Look, yes, it's another retelling and it takes inspiration from what's come before, but lest ye forget, what's come before was based off the book as is this and it's done quite well. Luc took some agency with the story we all know all too well at this point and had some fun with it. Honestly, this was absolutely fantastic work by Luc and the entire cast. While there ahs alwasy been a theme of love within the story of Dracula, nobody has taken the time to really make it into a full fledged love story. This does that, if not a bit dark and brooding. Even if you've seein every film that's come before this one, it's still 100% worth taking the time to watch this re-telling.
- fhe822026年6月26日Drácula: A Love Tale has great special effects, and visually there are moments where the movie looks genuinely impressive. The actors are fine too. Not amazing, not terrible, just okay. But the real problem is the story. How many Dracula movies are we going to get? It feels like every single year someone decides we need another version, another tragic origin, another romantic curse, another “this is how Dracula became Dracula” angle. At this point, it is tiring. The same old reboot story has been done so many times that even good visuals cannot make it feel fresh anymore. The movie may look good, but the story feels exhausted before it even begins. Dracula is one of the most iconic characters in horror, but even icons need a break. Please stop. No more Dracula origin films. Stop already.
- James Saenz2026年1月10日“i forbid you from killing yourself beneath my window!” “so you’d prefer i die further away?” the best parts are easily the costume and set design. everything else is kind of meh, a strange amalgamation of the source material and previous adaptations that doesn’t really achieve what its predecessors did (pales in comparison to the romance of coppola’s dracula, what humor is there doesn’t land as well as mckay’s renfield, and it lacks the atmosphere of herzog’s or eggers’ nosferatu adaptations). kind of the cw version of dracula, which isn’t necessarily bad but it’s also not something i would come back to when i have far better options.
- El'Jakod Odinsson2026年5月31日A wretched, baffling Dracula movie that wants badly to stand near Coppola’s 1992 version and instead trips face-first into the crypt. The changes from both Stoker and Coppola are almost all worse: no Van Helsing, no Renfield, no bats, wolves, mist, running-water problem, sun problem, or religious-iconography problem. Instead, Dracula apparently gets magic perfume. Even Danny Elfman is wasted, which feels like a crime of its own. The costuming is occasionally good, the castle looks cool, and then the movie goes right back to being dull, muted, and aggressively stupid. The gargoyles raise questions the film has no interest in answering. Caleb Landry Jones is terrible here, and that accent is a full-scale disaster. My dog could do better, and my dog does not speak. This is worse than Dracula 2000, which is not a sentence anyone should have to write. I gave it half a star, and even that feels generous. Negative ratings may need to exist.
- Arniox2026年5月28日I think it's good. Another Dracula story to add to list. This one much less about horror, and more about grief and the depth of loss. It's quite beautiful in this regard. How deep can love go, and how long can a man suffer in grief when his life is endless. It's a sad and interesting question.
- Shaydeknight2025年12月13日This new version of Dracula is an object lesson in how to drain a classic of its vitality without delivering anything fresh in return. The film is, fundamentally, a retelling of a retelling, far more indebted to Francis Ford Coppola's 1992 adaptation than to Bram Stoker's novel. What emerges is not an homage but the fuzzy mimeograph of someone else's vision, blurred by its own lack of conviction. The result is tedious. The film is never frightening. Its attempts at horror have all the menace of a baby drinking from a bottle. Narrative beats land with a dull thud, and the pacing suffers from long, bland stretches that fail to build tension or atmosphere. Caleb Landry Jones, as Dracula, is a puzzling piece of casting. He does competent work with what he is given, but he spends much of the film looking profoundly out of place. The costuming does him no favours: despite his height, he seems like an adolescent wearing his father's oversized suit, topped with an inexplicably silly hat. The effect undercuts any sense of menace or regality. For a character who should command the frame simply by existing in it, he has no presence whatsoever. This is, without exaggeration, the most insipid Dracula committed to film. Christoph Waltz delivers precisely what audiences have come to expect from him. He is always a pleasure to watch, even when the material around him is uninspired, and he brings a professionalism that briefly punctures the monotony. Production design is one of the few bright spots. The sets are attractive, thoughtfully crafted, and occasionally suggest a more interesting film struggling to emerge from underneath the rest of the enterprise. Unfortunately, direction from Luc Besson does little to elevate the material. Honestly, he hasn't produced anything truly remarkable in more than three decades, and Dracula continues that trajectory. The film lacks a distinct creative vision and the end product feels dated, tiresome, and wholly unnecessary. Ultimately, the film is a waste of time: uninspired, not at all scary, and forgettable. It contributes nothing to the long lineage of adaptations and fails to entertain. It is a retelling so diluted that it barely leaves a trace.
- Elli2026年4月16日Yet another Dracula movie however this one didn't seem to know if they were focusing on Vlad Il Dracul (Vlad the Dragon) who was the father of Vlad the Impaler or Dracula himself. They gave stories about them both in this movie about obsession rather than romance. Still a rather okay movie despite it.
- N2026年3月10日A long awaited watch! Not a 5 star film but thoroughly enjoyable. Terrific on-screen chemistry. Great concepts brought into the film, the Gargoyles being one. Getting to play around with an age-old tale must have been great creative fun! Caleb is a breath of fresh air as an actor, his roles are spot on and diverse. What a great honor to play such a big role in this film and really deliver. I enjoyed the style of meshing scenes of the ages together when Mina is in blue and walking towards the Count, visually impressive! I enjoyed the perfume entranced crowds dancing scene. Really fun and cleverly knitted into the movie. I also think the combat scenes with Dracula very sharp and graceful, like a dance, very cool. I could give critique I felt some scenes; namely, Mina's fiancé leaving the room in the last couple scenes too long, we didn't need to see him literally hobble away. The strange way Mina's fiance too appeared rather quickly in Paris, from Romania.. and with moderate injuries is a bit too noticeable. To wait 400 years to connect with her again and to agree to death is wild to me. He has just done to her what he has had happen to him.
お使いのデバイス向けのPlexを入手
20種類以上のプラットフォームで無料で使えます。お手持ちのデバイスをお選びください。Draculaに関するトリビア
Draculaは2025年7月30日に公開されました。
DraculaはLuc Bessonが監督を務めました。
Draculaの上映時間は2h 10mです。
DraculaはLuc Besson, Virginie Besson-Sillaがプロデューサーを務めました。
When a 15th-century prince denounces God after the loss of his wife he inherits an eternal curse: he becomes Dracula. Condemned to wander the centuries, he defies fate and death, guided by a single hope - to be reunited with his lost love.
Draculaの主要人物はVlad / Dracula (Caleb Landry Jones), Elisabeta / Mina (Zoë Bleu Sidel), Priest (Christoph Waltz)です。
DraculaはRと評価されています。
Draculaはファンタジー, ホラー, ロマンス映画です。
Draculaは、視聴者によって10点満点中8.2点をつけられています。
Draculaの予算は$5200万です。
Draculaの興行収入は$4240.5万です。