ランダム 存在の確率
監督:James Ward Byrkit7.289%81%7.2
ミラー彗星が地球に最接近する夜。エム（エミリー・バルドーニ）は恋人のケヴィン（モーリー・スターリング）とともに、友人主催のホームパーティーに訪れる。だが、男女8人で楽しく過ごそうとしていた矢先に突然の停電。暗闇の中でパニック状態に陥ったエムたちは、外の様子を確認に出るが、そこにいたのは、全く同じ家に住み、全く同じ姿をした自分たち。別世界の自分たちが、同じ空間に同時に存在するという驚愕の事実を目の当たりにした一行の運命は……？
ランダム 存在の確率の評価とレビュー
- ayayron2025年2月16日Trivia: Instead of scripts, the actors would each receive only a small paragraph (that only they would see) as their 'goals' for the day. This allowed for the story to unfold naturally and create genuine reactions in the other actors.
- synthete2026年4月20日A mix of "Whose Line Is It Anyway" as a way to perform a Twilight Zone episode. It's an interesting concept, performed fairly well, and seems opaque and complex until the film stops to make sure it tries its best so everyone in the back understands all the salient concepts and implications. I've read people say that it takes multiple viewings to understand it, but everything is explicable and traceable once the entirety of the concept's mechanics are unveiled, as long as one is able to retroactively piece things together. This could have made for a hell of a Star Trek TNG or Voyager episode that would have gained a lot by concerning characters everyone was familiar with and had developed an attachment to. The closest thing I remember off the top of my head was a ST:DS9 episode that dealt with similar concepts and stakes. But the only thing I felt was a problem in this film is that there isn't any doubt who the main character is by the last third, and I don't feel the actions taken in the end actually make sense for that character, so it ends up feeling forced just to have a dramatic and "shocking" early-2000s style ending. Decent and fairly unique performance-wise. No plan to ever re-watch.
- cdt772026年4月13日Awesome movie
- Niztradamus2026年4月6日This was great. Taking an idea from quantum phisics and warping it a bit to fit the narrative was just becoming popular around the time Coherence released. But this one sticks quite a bit closer than most. Even to the point of characters trying to explain some concepts wrong but the movie corrects them in their assumtions and presets what it actually be like. I really did enjoy this one.
- aitchi32026年3月7日It's so bad I can't review it
- Iqbal Subadi2024年12月8日Coherence is a brilliant example of minimalist filmmaking that punches well above its weight. Its intricate plot and compelling characters make it a must-watch for fans of psychological thrillers and thought-provoking sci-fi. While it may leave you with more questions than answers, that’s precisely what makes it unforgettable. Some viewers might find the film’s lack of direct explanations frustrating. The intentionally ambiguous ending leaves many questions unanswered, which might not sit well with audiences who prefer more closure.
- Nino Zlatev2025年7月28日This movie had great potential and a very abrupt and bad ending. It just feels like it got cut off at the best part. Still - it was quite enjoyable up until the end.
- PatrikStar2025年4月26日Watching this at 2:15am wasn't the best idea... gonna be traumatized for a bit now.
- Nicholas Florio2026年1月23日What a great movie, and I only had to watch it 3 times to completely understand it. Lol. I love films that experiment with time narratives or temporal anomalies but these ideas are sometimes hard to grasp the first time... for me.
- Brandon J Hicks2026年2月18日Unwatchable. The constant shaking and zooming of the camera which was obviously added in post makes me nauseous and the way the audio was recorded is way overstimulating. I really tried but had to turn it off half way through.
- Rick2025年8月10日Really cool premise, but it didn’t quite stick the landing for me.
- The_Holmes2025年5月21日This is film making. A budget of $20 and they made something very interesting, engaging and down right clever and enjoyable.
- Chris Rattray2026年1月27日Probs the best Coherence that ever cohered here tbh ngl
- Magnus Carlbaum2025年9月23日Absolutely brilliant one location movie, shot on a shoestring budget... In one of the film crews own home, if I remember correctly. Unknown cast (except one) do a stellar job keeping all dialogue feel completely natural. And the story? Oh god how I love the story. It's an urban campfire spooky tale, if you ask me. Deceptively simple. Fundamentally complex. The kind of movie that stays with you, long after you've watched it. Can't recommend it enough.
- z8mj52025年8月20日Great movie, really original
ランダム 存在の確率に関するトリビア
ランダム 存在の確率は2013年9月19日に公開されました。
ランダム 存在の確率はJames Ward Byrkitが監督を務めました。
ランダム 存在の確率の上映時間は88mです。
ランダム 存在の確率はLene Bausagerがプロデューサーを務めました。
ミラー彗星が地球に最接近する夜。エム（エミリー・バルドーニ）は恋人のケヴィン（モーリー・スターリング）とともに、友人主催のホームパーティーに訪れる。だが、男女8人で楽しく過ごそうとしていた矢先に突然の停電。暗闇の中でパニック状態に陥ったエムたちは、外の様子を確認に出るが、そこにいたのは、全く同じ家に住み、全く同じ姿をした自分たち。別世界の自分たちが、同じ空間に同時に存在するという驚愕の事実を目の当たりにした一行の運命は……？
ランダム 存在の確率の主要人物はEm (Emily Baldoni), Kevin (Maury Sterling), Mike (Nicholas Brendon)です。
ランダム 存在の確率はBと評価されています。
ランダム 存在の確率はサイエンスフィクション, スリラー, 謎映画です。
ランダム 存在の確率は、視聴者によって10点満点中8.1点をつけられています。
ランダム 存在の確率の予算は$50,000です。
ランダム 存在の確率の興行収入は$14万です。