阿特米斯的奇幻历险
Directed by Kenneth Branagh
《阿特米斯的奇幻历险》（Artemis Fowl）是一套由爱尔兰作家欧因·科弗（Eoin Colfer）所写的奇幻小说系列，也是迪士尼近年来出版的最畅销青少年图书之一。主角是一个少年电脑天才、年轻的犯罪首脑阿特米斯·法尔二世（Artemis Fowl II）。整个系列是由半严肃的口吻书写，黑暗中带有幽默。这一系列小说不但质量上堪可比肩J·K·罗琳的《哈利波特》以及罗尔德·达尔的《女巫》等，而且被影视圈认为有望成为下一个“哈利·波特”系列。
Where to Watch 阿特米斯的奇幻历险
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 Ratings & Reviews
- Shaydeknight2026年3月28日Artemis Fowl is booooooooring. Not slow, not measured, not restrained, just boring. You keep expecting something to kick in and it never does. That shouldn't surprise me, Kenneth Branagh directed it. I haven't liked anything by him since Henry V. The faerie world actually starts off reasonably well. Underground cities, glowing tech, a bit of mysticism mixed with sci-fi. It looks expensive and carefully built. Then the fakery starts to show. Everything becomes glossy and weightless. The environments stop feeling like places and start feeling like screensavers. The more time you spend there, the less convincing it becomes. It's all surface. The story is painfully simple. It's predictable, tidy, and completely without friction. Problems appear and disappear almost immediately. Characters shift sides because the plot needs them to, not because anything really changes. I haven't read the original novel, but the reaction from readers was loud and consistent. This isn't a faithful adaptation, which is almost expected at this point. Disney has a habit of sanding down anything with an edge until all that remains is a soft, harmless outline. The antagonist is ridiculous, I kept expecting her to yell "I'll get you next time, Gadget - er, I mean, Artemis!" Ferdia Shaw, in the title role, has all the charisma of wet clay. You can see the potential but he's stiff, flat, and oddly passive. Artemis is supposedly a prodigy, he's manipulative and dangerous in a polite way. Think Hannibal Lecter as a kid without the evil or casual cannibalism. The kid just stands there and delivers lines. Nothing sticks. The film DOES look good. The sets are polished. The effects are polished. Everything is polished. That's part of the problem. It feels assembled rather than real, even considering the subject matter. It's the showroom version of a fantasy film. And then there's Josh Gad. He's just exhausting. The mugging, the constant unfunny comic relief, the narration. It never stops. And yes, the dirt eating gag is just unpleasant. Not funny, not charming, just vaguely gross. The film keeps cutting back to him as if he's the glue holding everything together, when he's actually helping to drag it all down. Just about everything he does is tiresome and this is no different. What really kills it is how quickly everyone becomes a team. One minute these characters barely know each other, the next they're essentially Justice League Dark, working together with complete trust. No build-up, no tension, no reason for any of it. It feels like scenes are missing. There are emotional shortcuts everywhere, amounting to zero connections with the audience. In parallel, the pacing somehow manages to be rushed and dull at the same time. Things happen quickly, but none of them matter. So you get movement without engagement. That's a hard combination to pull off, but the film manages it. The whole experience is like going to a fancy restaurant and being served a bowl of whipped cream for dessert. No cake, no fruit, nothing underneath. Just air. And not even fresh whipped cream, the canned stuff. Sweet for a second, then you realize there's absolutely nothing satisfying there.
- Billy Zane2025年10月23日Not great, but definitely not as bad as everyone says.
- Pejhman2026年2月13日The best thing I can say about the Artemis Fowl movie is that at least I didn't have to pay money to see it. After waiting about 15 years to watch what was one of the most witty and well-written children's books I'd ever read come to life, Gilderoy F***ing Lockhart snuck into its room and butchered it with a blunt hatchet. It pays almost no attention to any of the characterisation and absolutely no attention at all to any of the plot lines, completely reinventing every aspect of the books with the same creativity, vigor and zeal as the esteemed authors of the Yellow Pages. The only things dryer than the actors were the lines they were forced to recite, presumably while their loved ones were held at gunpoint to ensure their compliance. Only Lara McDonnell gets anywhere near her character (Holly Short), but even then her character is decimated by a screenwriter who re-imagined her as an ingenue with daddy issues. Now I have to eat healthy and exercise in the vain hope that I can live long enough for a reboot in the hands of somebody who considering reading more than the Wikipedia abstract for the books prior to making the movies. In place of a star rating I would have preferred to give it a rating in black holes. Unfortunately, it lacks both the gravity and the content for such a rating, so I give it 3 steaming turds and a small flask of cat urine.
- Tyler K2025年9月1日Insulting to anyone that read the book.
- Callum2025年12月22日⭐½ – Artemis Fowl – A case study in how not to adapt a book This is one of those films where you can feel the missed opportunities leaking out of every scene. Artemis Fowl looks expensive, sounds busy, and yet somehow manages to be flat, confusing, and strangely joyless. It’s fantasy by committee — all the ingredients present, none of them allowed to develop a flavour. The story rushes through world-building like it’s afraid the audience might ask questions. Characters are introduced, explained, and emotionally resolved before you’ve had time to care about any of them. Stakes are announced rather than earned. Magic exists because the script says it does, not because it feels lived-in or meaningful. Performances range from serviceable to bewildered. Even talented actors seem stranded, delivering exposition instead of character. Whatever made the books beloved — wit, intelligence, moral ambiguity — is either flattened or missing entirely. The result feels less like a story and more like a corporate obligation. The most telling thing is this: the film actively made me relieved that I hadn’t read the source material. That’s never a good sign. A good adaptation should make you curious about the book. This one feels like it would only leave you disappointed on behalf of it. ⭐½ is generous, but the scale requires mercy. 🥤 Drink Pairing Flat lemonade — sweet in theory, dull in execution, and gone from memory almost immediately.
- zalic2025年6月8日Way to kill a beloved childhood series, Disney.
- freemajor2025年11月5日A ton of FX doesn't make a good movie. Woke casting, but the author would be upset about it: Butler is clearly “Eurasian” in the book, but they have to give roles to African Americans. Julius (!) Root is not a woman, but they wanted Judy Dench for the role. And no one—NO ONE—believes that the baby-faced guy is capable of any kind of deviousness, and he can't act it out either. Even the first Harry Potter looks more evil. Disney should be banned from adapting books.
- Coouge2025年9月14日I feel bad for the actors. It’s so bad.
- marshalsea2025年8月16日Crap, which as it's Kenneth Brannagh is suprising. Guess it was Disney interference - cause the source is highly regarded and supposedly the film is merely a lift of characters and the central tenet that the standard fantasy creatures are real. There's a lot of great actors who are obviously just doing it for the paycheck... there's also the two leads that are woefully meh. Josh Gad on the other hand really shines - doing huge amounts of heavy lifting for the film. Avoid.
Watch 阿特米斯的奇幻历险 Videos
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 Trivia
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 was released on 2020年5月28日.
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 was directed by Kenneth Branagh.
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 has a runtime of 1小时 34分钟.
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 was produced by Kenneth Branagh, Judy Hofflund.
《阿特米斯的奇幻历险》（Artemis Fowl）是一套由爱尔兰作家欧因·科弗（Eoin Colfer）所写的奇幻小说系列，也是迪士尼近年来出版的最畅销青少年图书之一。主角是一个少年电脑天才、年轻的犯罪首脑阿特米斯·法尔二世（Artemis Fowl II）。整个系列是由半严肃的口吻书写，黑暗中带有幽默。这一系列小说不但质量上堪可比肩J·K·罗琳的《哈利波特》以及罗尔德·达尔的《女巫》等，而且被影视圈认为有望成为下一个“哈利·波特”系列。
The key characters in 阿特米斯的奇幻历险 are Artemis Fowl II (Ferdia Shaw), Artemis Fowl I (Colin Farrell), Captain Holly Short (Lara McDonnell).
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 is rated PG.
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 is an Adventure, 家庭, 奇幻 film.
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 has an audience rating of 1.9 out of 10.
阿特米斯的奇幻历险 had a budget of US$1.3亿.