28 Years Later
Directed by Danny BoyleA group of survivors of the rage virus live on a small island. When one of the group leaves the island on a mission into the mainland, he discovers secrets, wonders, and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but other survivors.
28 Years Later Ratings & Reviews
- Vladimir Batista4d agoIt really doesn't add anything to the franchise.
- VandytNovember 26, 2025A colossal piece of crap, nothing like the first two. Impossible to watch from beginning to end
- danrinelliNovember 21, 2025Strong start, weak finish.
- jadennnnnnNovember 19, 2025the greatest horror film i've ever seen, bar NONE
- akNovember 17, 2025don't believe the critics. the movie is quite alright. i am a fan of the original (28 days), and of the trilogy in general. yes, the original is the original, and this is not quite on par with the original, but still an entertaining enough film to enjoy in your spare time if you're into this sort of thing.
- RipLinesManApril 29, 2025Event Horizon (1997) may have carved its legacy with cosmic horror and madness aboard a haunted spaceship, but 28 Years Later proves that terror can evolve just as savagely on Earth. Danny Boyle returns to the virus-ravaged world he helped define, and the result is a masterclass in tension, world-building, and dread that eclipses its predecessors. Jodie Comer leads with steely brilliance as Isla, anchoring a cast that includes Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s driven Jamie and Jack O’Connell as the tormented Jimmy Crystal. But it’s the young Alfie Williams as Spike who unexpectedly steals scenes with raw vulnerability. Ralph Fiennes brings gravitas as Dr. Kelson, and Erin Kellyman’s mysterious Jimmy Ink adds fire and unpredictability. Where Event Horizon dives inward—into the psyche and the soul—28 Years Later expands outward, exploring a world scarred by the rage virus, now mutated in ways both terrifying and tragic. The mainland holds more than infected threats; it’s a broken mirror of humanity, reflecting what survives after decades of ruin. With a haunting score, unflinching violence, and existential questions layered beneath the bloodshed, this film is both a brutal survival story and an emotional epic.
- DJMOKJune 22, 2025Waited 18yrs for this pile trash?! Holy crap this movie was sooo bad. I honestly don’t know what the hell i just watched. The music played during intense scenes were so out of place. It looks like the whole movie was filmed using a phone. The story made no sense and it was so confusing.
- Michael HeimgartnerJuly 6, 2025A Disappointing Return After So Many Years – Missed Potential Everywhere Danny Boyle is back in the director’s chair. Alex Garland on the script. On paper, that sounds like a dream team for 28 Years Later. What could go wrong, right? Well… apparently a lot. I know the international reviews are largely positive, but after my screening, the audience’s reaction was pretty clear: disappointment. And I’m right there with them. This just didn’t work for me at all. Let’s start with the premise itself. We’ve waited so long for a sequel. Boyle and Garland always said they’d only return if they had the right script. This is the story they landed on? Seriously? It feels like such a letdown. The infected (and yes, they’re not zombies, I know) are basically window dressing this time. There’s no real tension or threat like in the previous films. The father-son dynamic, with Jamie as the lead, just fell flat for me. Jamie is consistently unsympathetic, making it hard to care about his journey at all. The island group is equally bland, with motivations that make them difficult to root for or even understand. Spike, one of the main characters, acts so unbelievably stupid at times that I genuinely facepalmed in the theater. As for the mother-son subplot? Totally forgettable and emotionally hollow. Ralph Fiennes was the highlight for me – his character is cryptic, magnetic, and actually interesting. But even he’s criminally underused. The pacing is a huge issue. The first act drags like old chewing gum stuck to a shoe. When the story finally "gets going," it does so with such an eye-rollingly dumb inciting event that it completely took me out of it. The climax is worse: it descends into tonal chaos that feels like a total misfire. I just sat there at the end thinking: What the hell did I just watch? Then there’s the visual style. I get that Boyle loves his grainy, raw aesthetic. But the iPhone-level film quality? The weird, wannabe-artsy interludes? They clashed horribly with the supposed gritty realism. Instead of feeling immersive, it felt cheap and jarring. And don’t get me started on the infected scenes – they looked almost trashy, lacking the visceral intensity and detail that made the originals so iconic. Where 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later excelled in mood, dread, and world-building, this film remains vague, half-baked, and unfocused. After a 28-year time jump, I expected more exploration of what had changed in that world. Instead, we get empty suggestions and lots of open questions with no satisfying answers. Honestly, this is my biggest disappointment of the year so far. The trailer was incredible, and my expectations were sky-high. But this sequel feels like a rushed, underdeveloped cash-in that squanders the talent involved. There was so much potential here – and they missed it completely.
- HELPMENovember 16, 202510000 stars - one of my favorite movies of all time
- Marcelo ScatenaJuly 23, 2025It did what it wanted to do really well. Beautifully shot and has a few wonderful and subtle messages. I didn't connect with it, but I loved what it stood for.
- NiztradamusAugust 20, 2025This is not a 28 movie. This is a coming of age movie with zombies. I don't know what to tell you other than it's entertaining enough to keep you to the end but it's not particularly good. There is no logic in this movie either. There is a benzine explosion happening within an inclosed space yet the explosion somehow doesn't travel three feet (about one meter) down. That is not how physics work and there are endless examples like that in this movie. The ending is nothing short of grotesque too. It's setting up a sequel while also completely changing the tone which is what made this franchise special in the first place. It's like a DJ in a night club plays hard street rap and then shifts to classical the next song. By now I expect the sequel to be more a Scott Pilgrim movie than an 28 movie. I want to give it 2.5 stars since it was somewhat entertaining though I think an average rating is giving the movie too much credit. 2 stars.
- NLChaosNovember 13, 2025Just a nice watch although the story is a bit wacky at times the previous ones were better.
- cawhi3November 11, 2025Poor, very poor. Shame
- TycoSeptember 30, 2025Nothing like the original. For me it was a waste of time.
- janf81August 8, 2025I think my soul left my body, leaving me to Watch this shite alone. Could actually be the worst movie I’ve ever seen, I’m never gonna Get those hours back, what a waste. Do yourself a favor, watch a grey stone for two hours instead. Godspeed.
