何世紀にもわたる環境破壊の末、地球の温暖化が進み、北極・南極の氷はおろか、シベリアの広大な凍土までが全て溶け、地球に大洪水が起こった。海面は上昇し、地表を覆い、やかて陸地は消えて世界はついに海の底に沈んでしまう。それから数世紀。かつて地球と呼ばれたこの惑星にはわずかな人間だけが残されていた。文明と共に漂流を余儀なくされた彼らは海中から引き上げられた既に消滅した世界の残骸から、巨大な人工の浮遊都市を築いていた。
- Daniel Gustavsson2024年10月11日I found this movie really interesting and enjoyable. It has so much details that you don't see today and much more creativity than many movies. It also has that 90s feel to it. It really dares to be ambitious and amazingly it still manages to look pretty good, 20+ years after it was made. It feels so grand and well made. It is absolutely worth a watch!
- flavo432025年11月26日Waterworld had the potential to be a standout in the post-apocalyptic genre. I’ve always loved these types of films because they allow creators to break free from convention, as long as the world they build feels immersive and believable. In this case, the concept of a flooded Earth was fascinating, and the production team absolutely committed—constructing massive floating sets, designing unique vehicles, and crafting a society shaped entirely by life on the ocean. But despite the impressive world-building and staggering budget, the film falters where it matters most: character and script. With the exception of Dennis Hopper’s wonderfully unhinged Deacon, most characters feel flat or awkwardly written, never fully grounding themselves in the world around them. Their emotional arcs “landed dry,” lacking the depth needed to match the scale of the setting. Waterworld isn’t without ambition or visual spectacle, but ultimately the performances and storytelling aren’t strong enough to carry the film the rest of the way.
- adecaria2025年8月4日"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king," they say. In Waterworld, the man with gills should be king, but somehow this guy is only barely scraping by as a loner with absolutely no backstory to lean on. I wanted Costner's character to be a real superhero. I wanted a more fiendish villain than a one-eyed man who somehow enforces manual labor with a parade-toss of cigarettes. For a movie about an endless watery abyss... this has no depth at all.
- Jeremiah2025年7月18日On my first and only visit to the Mall of America I rode an indoor roller coaster and then dad took me to see Waterworld. Watching the Ulysses Cut which is like 40 min longer than the theatrical. Just kinda fleshing things out way more. I didnt mind it but it does slow down the movie some. From what little i can remember cause its been prob 2 decades if not more that ive seen this. This is far from perfect but man does it have some really cool highs. With a ton of them coming from Dennis Hopper who is absolutely hilarious in this role. I had several laugh out loud moments with him. When i read that he won a golden raspberry for this role, that just makes me hate that organization even more. Dare i say his overall role is just the blueprint for immorten joe. But way more hilarious. The genre comes full circle. There is a lot of things that dont work but there is a lot of things that do work. Including Costner where his lack of range doesnt get in the way of this role. All in all too its a cool world with some great world building. Next time i log this movie i will tell another strange coincidence story that has to do with this movie.
- Eduardo Defant4日前Just watched Waterworld and I really enjoyed it. Great movie with incredible world-building and amazing scenery. The action and atmosphere kept me hooked from start to finish. The only part I didn’t really like was the very ending, but overall it’s an excellent film. Highly recommended!
- ርልዪረ2025年2月8日🌊🌎It is the future and because of global warming all the ice sheets have melted. The Earth is therefore mostly flooded. The few surviving people try to eek out an existence on artificial atolls or ships. A good romp now transferred to Blu-ray. Good Science Fiction movie with Kevin Costner at his best
- PhysicalMedia4Life2026年6月2日"Waterworld" in my mind is such an important film not just back then; but more now than its ever been, because of the subject matter that is global warming. You can see by the whole look of the film, the budget that went into it, it's very telling.Yes it has its flaws but overall this a very good film; that is highly watchable and it just feels so big in sheer scale as well. They don't make them like this anymore and over the years, I have really liked & appreciated "Waterworld" more & more as time as gone on!! There's great action sequences & set pieces, the beautifully shot, the acting is very believable & realistic this film has so much going for it and the fact that this bombed 💣 at the box office blows my mind 🤯🤯🤯 tbh!! The whole message of this film is very important due to the fact, that this could happen to our world 🌎 and our world could end up becoming a "Waterworld" it's really scary s**t when you stop and think about it. And finally My Ratings/Scores for "Waterworld" is a very solid ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️.25 out of 5 Stars 🌟 & a 8.5/10
お使いのデバイス向けのPlexを入手
20種類以上のプラットフォームで無料で使えます。お手持ちのデバイスをお選びください。ウォーターワールドに関するトリビア
ウォーターワールドは1995年7月28日に公開されました。
ウォーターワールドはKevin Reynoldsが監督を務めました。
ウォーターワールドの上映時間は2h 15mです。
ウォーターワールドはCharles Gordon, John Davis, Kevin Costner, Lawrence Gordonがプロデューサーを務めました。
何世紀にもわたる環境破壊の末、地球の温暖化が進み、北極・南極の氷はおろか、シベリアの広大な凍土までが全て溶け、地球に大洪水が起こった。海面は上昇し、地表を覆い、やかて陸地は消えて世界はついに海の底に沈んでしまう。それから数世紀。かつて地球と呼ばれたこの惑星にはわずかな人間だけが残されていた。文明と共に漂流を余儀なくされた彼らは海中から引き上げられた既に消滅した世界の残骸から、巨大な人工の浮遊都市を築いていた。
ウォーターワールドの主要人物はMariner (Kevin Costner), Deacon (Dennis Hopper), Helen (Jeanne Tripplehorn)です。
ウォーターワールドはGと評価されています。
ウォーターワールドはAction, Adventure, サイエンスフィクション映画です。
ウォーターワールドは、視聴者によって10点満点中4.4点をつけられています。
ウォーターワールドの予算は$1.8億です。
ウォーターワールドの興行収入は$2.6億です。