A doctor's wife tires of his obsession with model trains, and spends her days wondering about the son she gave up for adoption at birth. While eating at a roadside café, she encounters a British hitchhiker, who turns out to be her son. They spend time together trying to find a bond. The son begins to hate the husband, and the wife begins worrying about the safety of her husband and his train set.
- Pyutaros2026年2月14日The tragedy of Track 29 is that even when the camera stays on Linda, it is never actually looking at her; it is a systemic failure of the Bechdel test that renders her a human vessel for the masculine architecture of her own life. She is trapped between Dr. Henry’s clinical, "Low-Temperature" control and the Stranger’s primal, "High-Temperature" aggression, existing only as a reactive input to their conflicting mandates. By manifesting the Stranger as a savior to her boredom, Linda isn't claiming agency but is instead hiring a mental mercenary—a move that proves she has been denied the internal tools to save herself. This is punctuated by the diner scene with Arlanda, where the social "logic-check" fails, confirming that Linda’s reality is a solo loop where even her rebellion is just another male projection. This structural erasure extends beyond the script and into the real-world critical reception of the film, which serves as a bitter mirror to the patriarchy on screen. Gary Oldman was universally lauded for his "brave" and "unhinged" performance, rewarded for the same high-temperature unpredictability that makes his character a predator, while Theresa Russell was dragged for her technical choices. The industry punished her for refusing to be the beautiful, compliant vessel the male gaze demands. She chose a jarring, infantile, and hyper-stylized performance by design to reflect a woman whose development was frozen at fifteen. If Russell had been less conventionally attractive, those same choices—the bows, the braces, the high-pitched fragility—would have been praised as "quirky" or "character-driven." Instead, because she didn't satisfy the aesthetic baseline expected of her, her work was dismissed, proving that the critics were just as blinded by the "Stepford" expectation as Henry himself. Henry represents the sterile "geometry" of the household, treating Linda like a behavioral error that needs to be sedated rather than a woman with a history. His manipulative nature, seen in his negotiated sexual payout in the car, stands as a cold contrast to the raw, un-negotiated intimacy of the piano scene. Yet, the film falls into the lazy Hollywood trap of pathologizing every expression of fringe desire, insisting that Linda’s psyche must be a "symptom" of her 15-year-old trauma. This robs her of any adult autonomy and forces her memories into a "Grindhouse" filter where she re-edits her own life using cinematic tropes like the Cape Fear bridge. In the end, she doesn't break the cycle; she just swaps a "Daddy" for a "Son," donning the Stepford mask to drive away from one male-dominated script into another, proving her perspective remains the background noise to a masculine crash.
お使いのデバイス向けのPlexを入手
20種類以上のプラットフォームで無料で使えます。お手持ちのデバイスをお選びください。トラック29に関するトリビア
トラック29は1988年7月12日に公開されました。
トラック29はNicolas Roegが監督を務めました。
トラック29の上映時間は90mです。
トラック29はRick McCallumがプロデューサーを務めました。
A doctor's wife tires of his obsession with model trains, and spends her days wondering about the son she gave up for adoption at birth. While eating at a roadside café, she encounters a British hitchhiker, who turns out to be her son. They spend time together trying to find a bond. The son begins to hate the husband, and the wife begins worrying about the safety of her husband and his train set.
トラック29の主要人物はLinda Henry (Theresa Russell), Martin (Gary Oldman), Henry Henry (Christopher Lloyd)です。
トラック29はRと評価されています。
トラック29はドラマ, 謎映画です。
トラック29は、視聴者によって10点満点中4.2点をつけられています。
トラック29の予算は$500万です。
トラック29の興行収入は$43万です。