- jackmeat2025年10月10日My quick rating - 6.3/10. Basically the same movie as the sequel (which I accidentally watched first). Basically, a young adult goes against the system and goes on a killing spree to try and teach the world a lesson. There is plenty of propaganda in this movie, but it isn't that far off, just a tad bit too extreme. Still entertaining, albeit violent and mean-spirited. An extra couple of tenths of a point for an interesting end (easy to guess) and a slightly better job acting. Oh, and always nice to see Max Headroom in a movie LOL Hopefully, Uwe Boll can continue the upward mobility in movie making, since his last 3 that I have seen have been pretty good, and that is hard to say with a straight face after the crap he has made in the past, but still true.
- Patrick Wai1日前What if John Wick had no code, no honor, and believed mass murder was a legitimate way to fix society? That’s essentially the origin story Uwe Boll explores here. Bill Williamson isn’t a tragic antihero. He’s a man with a deeply warped worldview who thinks he’s found the answer to humanity’s problems. Ironically, the violence isn’t the film’s greatest strength. It’s Bill’s conversations. Some of his dialogue is surprisingly engaging, and I found myself wishing Boll had invested more time refining those philosophical exchanges instead of simply moving on to the next shooting. Whether you agree with Bill or not, he isn’t portrayed as a mindless monster. He has a twisted internal logic, which makes him far more unsettling. The film could have benefited from more character development, especially between Bill and his best friend Evan. Their relationship had the potential to add emotional weight and provide insight into how someone like Bill became who he is. Technically, the movie shows its modest budget. The handheld camera work is often distracting, the editing is rough around the edges, and the acting is mostly serviceable rather than exceptional. Brendan Fletcher commits completely to the role, even if his performance occasionally feels uneven. His dedication carries much of the film. One thing I appreciated was Boll’s restraint. Despite the subject matter, he doesn’t endlessly revel in the bloodshed. The shootings and explosions are brutal but relatively matter-of-fact, making the violence feel more disturbing than entertaining. Given today’s reality of recurring mass shootings, Rampage can be an uncomfortable watch. Thankfully, whatever political statement Boll wanted to make isn’t relentlessly hammered into the audience. The film presents its disturbing ideas and largely leaves viewers to wrestle with them on their own. Rampage isn’t a polished film. It’s rough, uneven, and technically flawed. But beneath its low-budget exterior is an unsettling character study of a man who believes he’s saving the world by destroying it. That idea lingers long after the credits roll, even if the filmmaking itself doesn’t always rise to the same level.
- joshuanash8042025年4月8日Have you ever watched a movie that was so unrealistic, but, you had to keep watching it to see how ridiculous it would get? This was it. Not that nut jobs like this guy aren't out there. The people in the town he was killing had the attention span of a goldfish, and the law enforcement response was so bad that it was laughable. I mean, at least make it somewhat realistic.
お使いのデバイス向けのPlexを入手
20種類以上のプラットフォームで無料で使えます。お手持ちのデバイスをお選びください。ザ・テロリストに関するトリビア
ザ・テロリストは2009年9月27日に公開されました。
ザ・テロリストはUwe Bollが監督を務めました。
ザ・テロリストの上映時間は81mです。
ザ・テロリストはDan Clarke, Uwe Boll, Shawn Williamsonがプロデューサーを務めました。
両親と同居するブルーカラーの青年ビル・ウィリアムソン。彼は常に鬱屈し、怒りに満ちていた。その対象は地球の温暖化、世界の食糧危機、人口過剰、見境のない石油のムダ遣い。また、自分の日常もウンザリするようなことの連続。彼は自身以外の全てを憎み、ついに内なる憎悪が暴走。彼は自らの正気を証明するため、全身武装の無差別大量虐殺を始める。
ザ・テロリストの主要人物はBill Williamson (Brendan Fletcher), Evan Drince (Shaun Sipos), Sheriff Melvoy (Michael Paré)です。
ザ・テロリストはRと評価されています。
ザ・テロリストはAction, 犯罪, スリラー映画です。
ザ・テロリストは、視聴者によって10点満点中5.1点をつけられています。
ザ・テロリストの予算は$120です。
ザ・テロリストの興行収入は$428です。